Suburb · 111 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Drawn from OpenStreetMap
Port Clarence scores 57/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for food & drink (88) and transport (84).
It scores lowest on health (39).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Port Clarence in North East, each measured against the national average.
Port Clarence doesn't try to be anything other than what it is: a small, low-density pocket on the Tees estuary, terraced streets, industrial skyline within view, and a population so small it barely registers as a suburb rather than a hamlet. It's not a place you'd stumble into — you'd come here because you already know someone, or you're drawn by the price.
And the price is really the story. Housing here sells at a median of £128,000, terraced and freehold almost without exception, which puts it roughly a fifth below typical values even within Stockton-on-Tees itself — one of the more affordable authorities in the country to begin with. Against the national figures, Port Clarence sits at the very bottom end of the property scale, the kind of place where a For Sale board means a straightforward two-up two-down changing hands between local buyers rather than investors chasing yield. That affordability is real and it shows up in the numbers as an A-grade for the area — but it sits alongside an income and deprivation ranking at the very bottom decile nationally, which is the honest trade-off behind the cheap bricks. The one school in the local sample, High Clarence Academy, carries a Requires Improvement rating, and there's no Outstanding primary or secondary in the picture here — worth knowing if schooling is what's driving your search.
Green space is thin on the ground quite literally — under a fifth of a hectare across two small sites — so this isn't an area built around parks or long dog walks; life here happens indoors, in the home, or elsewhere. There isn't a restaurant or high-street scene to speak of either. What you do get is quiet: crime sits low in absolute terms, 23 incidents across the year, dominated by violence and anti-social behaviour categories that are common everywhere, and the safety grade of C+ reflects a place that's flat rather than declining — no worsening trend, just a steady, unremarkable baseline. The crime-rate comparison to Stockton borough overall looks dramatic on paper, but with a population this small a handful of incidents swings the rate hard, so treat that figure as noise rather than a verdict on the streets themselves.
This is a place for someone who wants low cost of living above almost everything else, doesn't need shops, restaurants or parks on the doorstep, and is comfortable with an industrial, semi-isolated setting rather than a conventional suburb. Connectivity and transport are modest rather than strong, so a car matters more than a train timetable. If your priorities are affordability and quiet over amenity and choice, it's worth a look; if you need schools with strong Ofsted ratings or a lively weekend scene, you'll find those more easily elsewhere in the borough.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.