Suburb · 56 residents
Good · better than 8 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Clarence Cottages scores 67/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (86) and transport (83).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Clarence Cottages in North East, each measured against the national average.
Clarence Cottages is a small pocket of terraced streets, and it feels that way on the ground — a handful of roads, freehold houses close together, nothing that reads as new-build or aspirational, just settled brick terraces that have housed the same kind of working families for generations.
The numbers on housing tell a plain story: this is Terraced, Freehold territory almost without exception, and a median sale price around £128,000 sits well under both the regional and national medians — a For Sale board here is advertising an entry-level, low-turnover street rather than anything with room to negotiate on style. That affordability shows up again in the council tax band and the rent, both modest against national norms. Schooling is thin on the named side — High Clarence Academy, the primary in the sample, is currently rated Requires Improvement, which is worth sitting with if you have young children, since it's the one local data point pulling against an otherwise decent overall schools grade. Transport is limited too: only two stops recorded, so this isn't a commuter's suburb in the way some North East pockets are — you'd be relying on a car or a longer bus journey rather than stepping onto a direct rail line.
Green space per head roughly matches the regional average, and the area's population density is low — this is a quiet, low-footfall corner rather than a busy through-route, which fits with there being little in the way of recorded nightlife or restaurant culture here. Health outcomes and environment both grade respectably, and the internet infrastructure — just over half on full fibre — is unremarkable but serviceable. The crime figures need context: the 12-month count itself is small in absolute terms, and violence and sexual offences make up the largest single share, consistent with the safety grade sitting a notch below the area's stronger marks on housing and schools. The percentage comparison against Stockton-on-Tees looks alarming on paper, but with a population this size, small raw numbers swing that ratio hard — the safety trend itself is recorded as flat, not worsening, which is the more reliable read.
This suits someone who wants a cheap freehold foothold in a quiet, low-density corner of Stockton-on-Tees and doesn't need a train line on the doorstep or a lively high street to feel settled. It's less suited to anyone prioritising school choice or wanting the reassurance of a strong, unambiguous safety grade — those are the honest trade-offs a small, affordable street like this one asks you to weigh.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.