Village · 105 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Easton Maudit scores 54/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (71).
It scores lowest on health (34) and food & drink (37).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Easton Maudit in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Easton Maudit is the kind of place you drive through slowly without meaning to — a scatter of stone and brick houses, no shop front, no pub sign to slow the traffic, just hedgerows and the sense that everyone here already knows each other. It attracts an older, settled crowd rather than newcomers passing through; the median age sits a decade above the national figure, and that shows in the quiet rather than in anything you could point to.
There's no rail station in the village itself, and the bus stops number only a handful, so this is a place you live if you're comfortable driving for most things, including the school run — the closest sample school, Bozeat Community Primary, carries a solid "Good" rating rather than the top grade, which is worth knowing if Ofsted is your first filter. Housing here is dominated by detached freehold houses, no new-builds in the mix, and the numbers back up the picture: a For Sale board on this street is almost certainly selling an older detached or semi, sold outright rather than leasehold, at a median price that runs about 17% above the wider North Northamptonshire area. That premium buys you space and distance from your neighbours rather than transport links or nightlife — there's a reason the connectivity grade rides on broadband (full fibre coverage here is strong) rather than on buses or trains.
Green space is where the numbers surprise you: with only one recorded green space and well under half a hectare, this isn't a village built around a park or a common — its rural surroundings do that job instead, informally, in the fields and lanes around it rather than in anything mapped. There's no named restaurant or pub venue in the picture either, so eating out means driving to a neighbouring village or town, and healthcare likewise sits a notch below the rest of the profile — a "C+" against an otherwise strong set of marks, the one grade that breaks the pattern. Crime is genuinely low in absolute terms, just under thirty incidents across the year, and the rate runs nearly 17% below the parent authority's average — violence and anti-social behaviour top the list, as they do almost everywhere, but the volume is small enough that a handful of incidents swings the percentages more than the reality on the ground.
This adds up to a village for people who've already decided they want quiet over convenience: settled households, most likely with a car each, unbothered by the absence of a station or a high street, happy to trade nightlife and casual dining for space, low crime, and a broadband connection good enough to work from home on the days you don't fancy the drive. If you need buses at the end of the road or a pub within stumbling distance, this isn't it — but if what you're after is genuinely rural and don't mind the isolation that comes with it, the trade-off here is honest rather than hidden.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.