Castle Ashby in East Midlands has a Check Local Score of 63/100 (good), drawn from official data on safety, schools, transport, housing, amenities and the local environment, each measured against the national average — a score of 60 is typical for the country.
Castle Ashby doesn't really have a high street in the way most villages do — it's the kind of place built around a big house and its parkland, with a scatter of estate cottages and a population you could fit into a couple of large office floors. There's no crowd here, no passing trade, just a very quiet residential pattern that suits people who've already decided they don't want a bustling centre. The median age sits north of 51, well above the national average, and that tells you plenty about the rhythm: this is a settled, established community rather than one that's still filling up.
If you're weighing up the practicalities, the picture is coherent rather than spectacular. Housing here is dominated by freehold terraces and semis — eight of nine recent sales were freehold, and the median sale price of £270,000 actually undercuts the national average, sitting close to the regional norm too, which is a little surprising for a village attached to a stately estate. It's priced about 5% below the wider West Northamptonshire market. Rents, at £1,075 a month, run close to the national median. On schooling, Yardley Hastings Primary School carries an Outstanding rating and stands as the nearest such school, which matters if you've got young children, though the median age here suggests most residents aren't in that stage of life. Public transport is thin — four stops and no rail station recorded for the village itself — so this reads as a driving village, not a commuter one.
Day to day, green space is modest in scale — the two recorded plots run to about a hectare and a half between them, nothing like the acreage you'd get in the surrounding countryside more broadly, though the presence of Castle Ashby's own parkland grounds shapes the character of a walk here more than the raw hectare count suggests. There isn't a restaurant scene to speak of, and healthcare and environment both grade at C+, a step down from the B+ that colours most of the other categories — worth noting if daily conveniences and access to services matter to you, since this isn't a place where you pop out for anything. Crime is genuinely low in absolute terms — 15 incidents across the year — but the rate per head runs well above the parent authority's average once you account for the tiny population, so those numbers should be read as village-scale noise rather than a pattern to worry about; violence and anti-social behaviour make up the bulk of it, as they do almost everywhere.
This suits someone who wants space, quiet, and a strong sense of place over convenience — an established household, not tied to a daily commute, happy to drive for shopping and days out, and drawn to the setting more than the social calendar. It's less suited to anyone who wants a walkable centre, a rail link on the doorstep, or a wide choice of schools and services within the village boundary itself.
Data last updated: 15 August 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.