Village · 993 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Crowmarsh Gifford scores 84/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for food & drink (90) and safety (82).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Crowmarsh Gifford in South East, each measured against the national average.
Crowmarsh Gifford is the kind of place where the houses do the talking: detached brick and flint sitting behind hedges, the odd converted barn, nothing that looks like it was built after 1990. There's no high street to speak of, just the Thames-side road out towards Wallingford and a scatter of period homes that make clear this is a village for people who've already made their money rather than people chasing a starter home.
The numbers back that reading up. A median sale price of £475,000 against a national median of £281,000 puts this comfortably above the country as a whole, though it actually undercuts its own district — 11.8% higher than the South Oxfordshire parent average doesn't sound like undercutting, but set against the region's £577,000 typical detached price, Crowmarsh Gifford is one of the more accessible corners of a very expensive district. Almost everything sold here is freehold, dominated by detached houses, which is the property-board shorthand for a village where people buy once and stay: the median age of 47.7 against a national 40.4 confirms it. There's a single school in the immediate data, Crowmarsh Gifford Church of England School, rated Good and taking on 226 pupils — solid rather than exceptional, and if you want an Outstanding primary or secondary you'll be looking beyond the village boundary. Commuting is not the headline here; this reads as a place people retire to or settle in once they're established, not a first rung for London-bound thirty-somethings.
Green space is generous relative to the size of the place — eight separate spaces packed into a small population — and with the Thames running past and Wallingford a stone's throw over the bridge, the weekend shape here is walking and pub lunches rather than restaurant crawls; the data doesn't give a named venue, but the pattern of the village makes clear that's the register. Safety is the standout grade — A+, well above the national norm, with crime numbers so low (19 incidents across the past year) that the 58% share attributed to violence and sexual offences reflects a handful of cases rather than a pattern to worry about. Health and environment grades sit high too, connectivity and transport solidly mid-table with a B+, and full-fibre broadband reaching two-thirds of properties — decent by rural standards, not cutting-edge. The one grade that breaks from the pattern is affordability, a C+ amid a run of As and Bs, which is simply the honest cost of buying into a safe, spacious, well-kept village: you pay for the quiet.
This suits people who've decided that space, safety and a slower pace outrank convenience — households not counting on a rail commute, not needing bustling nightlife, comfortable with one solid rather than spectacular school. If you're looking for a starter home or a five-minute walk to the shops, this isn't your village; if you want a settled, low-crime spot on the Thames with room to breathe, it's hard to find much wrong with it.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.