Village · 470 residents
Good · better than 2 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Wormingford scores 55/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (70).
It scores lowest on food & drink (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Wormingford in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Wormingford is the kind of place where the houses sit apart from each other, detached and hedge-bound, and where you're more likely to pass a tractor than a bus on the road through it. With just over 600 people spread thinly across the parish, there's none of the huddle you get in a market town — this is open, low-density countryside living, and the streetscape tells you that before any spreadsheet does.
The numbers back up the visual impression of comfortable, settled money. A median age of 49 says this isn't a place full of young families chasing their first step onto the ladder — it's a village of people who arrived some years ago and stayed. Property sales here skew heavily toward detached freehold homes, seven out of seven in the local sample, with a median price around £437,500 — well above both the Colchester district figure and the national median, though the small sample size means you shouldn't read too much precision into it. That premium, close to 39% above Colchester itself, marks Wormingford out as one of the pricier corners of its own district, not just the region. On schooling, the one sample in the data — Fordham All Saints CofE Primary — carries an Inadequate Ofsted rating, which is worth knowing and worth checking against more recent inspection history before you commit; it sits oddly against a village that otherwise reads as comfortable and low-risk.
Safety is where Wormingford quietly earns its keep: the overall grade sits in solid B territory, but safety alone grades top marks, and with only 21 recorded incidents across the past year — a third of them violence and sexual offences, the rest a scatter of theft and criminal damage — this is a place where crime is talked about in single figures, not statistics. Connectivity and transport both grade well above average too, with full fibre reaching over 60% of the area, useful if you're working from home rather than commuting daily. There are eight transport stops locally, but no rail station in the picture here, so this reads as a driving village rather than a walk-to-the-platform one.
Green space is present but modest — three plots totalling just over three hectares, enough for a proper walk but not vast parkland. There isn't a restaurant scene to speak of in what's available here, which fits a village of this size: this is a place you drive out from for your evening out, not one where the high street does it for you. Council tax band D sits close to the regional norm, and the affordability grade is strong given the income decile locally sits well above average — this is not a village stretched thin. Altogether it suits someone who wants space, quiet, and a fairly secure feeling underfoot, provided they're not relying on the village itself for schools, restaurants, or a train platform at the end of the road.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.