Village · 326 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Wormegay scores 43/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (81) and affordability (70).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and infrastructure (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Wormegay in East of England, each measured against the national average.
The houses thin out fast once you're through the village, hedgerows taking over from pavements, and the sense you get driving through is of a place that has stayed put while the world commuted past it. Wormegay isn't styled for visitors — there's no obvious high street to speak of — it's a working Norfolk village where the traffic is mostly tractors and dog walkers, and the average age on the electoral roll tells you this is a settled, older population rather than a young one passing through.
There's no rail station here, and that absence shapes everything else: this is a place for people who drive, or who've arranged their life so they don't need to go far. Holy Cross Church of England Primary, rated Good, covers the youngest end of things, though with only 48 pupils on its books it's the kind of school where your child would be known by name rather than lost in a year group. Housing sits mostly as semi-detached freehold stock, no new-build estates diluting the mix, and at a median of roughly £272,500 for recent sales it undercuts both the regional figure and the King's Lynn and West Norfolk district average — a modest premium of a few percent over the district, but still comfortably below what you'd pay across the East of England as a whole. This is a buy-and-stay market, not a flipping one; turnover here runs below the national rate, which tells you people don't leave once they're in.
Green space is scarce in acreage — just a couple of small plots rather than any sweeping parkland — so day-to-day life leans on the wider Norfolk countryside beyond the village boundary rather than anything formally mapped and named within it. There's no restaurant scene to speak of, no pub life detailed in what's known about the place, so this isn't somewhere you move for evenings out; it's somewhere you retreat to after them. Full-fibre broadband reaches a solid majority of properties, which matters more than it once did if you're working from home rather than commuting to one. On safety, the picture is genuinely reassuring — grade A, seven incidents across the year, and half of those the sort of violence-and-sexual-offences category that in a village this size can mean one or two isolated events rather than a pattern. It's flat, not improving or worsening, which in this context is exactly what you want to hear: a low number staying low.
The overall grade lands at B — respectably above the national average — but it's worth noticing the shape underneath: safety and environment score strongly, while transport and connectivity sit at C, and health at C+. That's the quiet trade-off here. You're not buying into infrastructure or amenity density; you're buying into quiet, into freehold brick-and-tile stability, into a place ranked in the middle-to-better half nationally for deprivation without pretending to be anything more urban than it is. If your life needs a station platform or a evening restaurant scene, this will grate within a month. If it needs quiet roads, a settled community, and a school where the head teacher knows your surname, Wormegay holds up.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.