Town · 1,847 residents
Good · better than 5 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Wolsingham scores 66/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (87) and environment (82).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Wolsingham in North East, each measured against the national average.
Wolsingham looks like what it is: a stone-built Durham dales village where terraced and semi-detached houses line the streets in roughly equal measure, the pace is set by people who've been there a while, and nobody is in a hurry. The median age here is 52, more than a decade older than the national figure, and that shows in the rhythm of the place rather than in any one shopfront — this isn't a village geared around young families moving through, it's one where people settle.
If you're weighing up the practical picture, it's a mixed one. There's a single rail count in the transport data but no named station to walk to, and the connectivity grade sits at a middling C+ against otherwise strong marks elsewhere, so this is a place you'll drive from more than commute from by train. Schooling locally centres on Wolsingham Primary School, a community school with 163 pupils, though the area's school progress score (-0.35) suggests it's worth looking at in detail rather than assuming from reputation alone. On housing, the terraced-and-freehold pattern (all twelve sampled sales were freehold, and terraces were the single largest group) tells you what a For Sale board here usually means: an older stone terrace, bought outright, not a leasehold flat or a new-build estate. Prices reflect that too — a median around £205,000 sits well under the national £281,000 and even under the regional £155,000 uplift, though County Durham as a whole is cheaper still, so Wolsingham runs 64% above its own county's median. This is a village that costs more than its unitary authority but far less than the national average — a genuine affordability position, not just a statistic.
Green space is generously provided for a settlement this size — sixteen and a half hectares across a dozen sites for a population of 539 is a markedly higher ratio than either the regional or national average, so weekends here lean outdoors rather than indoors by default. The overall grade profile is strong: A for environment, A for health, A+ for affordability, and an A overall — but safety sits at a plainer B, with violence and sexual offences making up over a third of the (modest) 40 recorded incidents in the past year, and the trend reading flat rather than improving or worsening. That's the one line worth sitting with — not alarming against a village of this size, but it's the grade that breaks the pattern of an otherwise top-tier scorecard, and against County Durham as a whole the crime rate here still runs meaningfully lower.
This suits someone who wants space, quiet, and value for money more than fast connectivity or a young, busy social scene — an older buyer, a remote worker, or someone leaving a city for good rather than commuting into one. It's a harder sell if you need a rail link on your doorstep or a school with a clearly strong progress record, and worth checking the crime breakdown in more detail before you commit, given how much of it sits in one category.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.