Village · 751 residents
Very good · better than 8 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Wivelsfield Green scores 71/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (80) and property market (71).
It scores lowest on health (37).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Wivelsfield Green in South East, each measured against the national average.
Wivelsfield Green reads as detached houses behind hedges, gravel drives, and not much passing traffic — the kind of place you'd only find if you were already headed there. At 175 people and a population density a fraction of the national average, this is scattered village living rather than anything resembling a high street scene, and the houses on offer make that plain: ten of the two dozen recent sales were detached, the tenure is overwhelmingly freehold, and the local median for a detached home sits at £645,000 against £420,000 nationally. A For Sale board here is generally advertising space and privacy, not proximity to anything.
That price tag needs context. Against Lewes district as a whole, homes here run about 24% higher, and the wider affluence picture backs that up — this sits in the ninth income and deprivation decile nationally, comfortably among the better-off pockets of the South East. Wivelsfield Primary School is the one school actually in the village, a community primary with 255 pupils; anyone with older children will be looking beyond the village boundary. The area doesn't lean on a rail station of its own in this dataset, so anyone commuting will want to check what's realistic from neighbouring villages before assuming a quick run to Brighton or London. Median age of just under 40 suggests settled households rather than a young renters' market, which tallies with the freehold-heavy, family-house profile.
Green space is modest in scale — four separate patches totalling under two hectares — so this isn't a village built around a grand park, more the kind of place where gardens do the work and dog walks head out into the surrounding countryside rather than a named local green. There's no restaurant or pub named in what's on record here, which fits a village of this size: eating out generally means driving to Haywards Heath or Lewes rather than crossing the road. Broadband is solid enough for home working, with full fibre reaching around 70% of properties, so remote days are a realistic part of the picture even without a station on the doorstep.
The safety picture is the quiet standout: an overall grade of A, safety graded A too, and only six recorded incidents in the past twelve months, holding flat rather than drifting either way. Against that, schools sit a notch lower at B+, mainly because there's only the one school to judge the village by, and the health grade is a middling B rather than anything exceptional. What you get is a small, safe, well-off village of detached houses and quiet lanes, priced well above the regional norm, that asks you to be comfortable driving for shops, secondary schooling, and a night out — the trade-off is space and calm bought at the cost of doing very little on foot.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.