Village · 478 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Summary · written from the figures on this page
Whittlebury is the sort of place where the housing stock does most of the talking — stone and thatch, long gardens, cars parked on gravel rather than tarmac, and barely fifty people spread across it. There's no high street to speak of, no row of shops to browse; this is a village in the older, quieter sense, where the school and the church anchor things and everything else is a drive away.
Read the full summary ↓Map outline: Official built-up area
Whittlebury scores 59/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is affordability (69).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Whittlebury in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Whittlebury is the sort of place where the housing stock does most of the talking — stone and thatch, long gardens, cars parked on gravel rather than tarmac, and barely fifty people spread across it. There's no high street to speak of, no row of shops to browse; this is a village in the older, quieter sense, where the school and the church anchor things and everything else is a drive away.
The one school in the village, Whittlebury Church of England Primary, is a small voluntary controlled school with just under sixty pupils — the kind of place where teachers know every child by name, though it hasn't got a published Ofsted rating to point to. Housing here leans heavily towards freehold semi-detached and detached homes, nine sales in the recent sample and not a single leasehold among them, which tells you this is a place people buy into properly rather than pass through. At a median of £360,000, it sits above both the regional and national medians, and a full 26% above the wider West Northamptonshire figure — you're paying a premium for the village setting, not for square footage alone. There's no rail station listed for the immediate area, so this is a driving village: the six local transport stops suggest bus links exist, but anyone commuting by train will be adding a car journey to the front of their day.
Green space is thin on the ground in the literal sense — two plots totalling under a hectare — so this isn't a village built around parkland; the appeal is the surrounding countryside rather than anything manicured within the boundary. Broadband is a genuine strength, though: full fibre reaches over 93% of properties, well above what you'd expect for somewhere this rural, so working from home here is more plausible than the setting first suggests. The crime picture needs a little unpacking — the headline numbers look alarming against West Northamptonshire, but with only three incidents recorded in the past year and a population of 44, the percentages swing wildly on tiny counts; the safety grade itself sits in line with the area's other strong grades, and the trend is flat, not worsening. Health is the one grade that breaks the pattern, sitting at C+ against a run of B+ scores elsewhere — worth a mental note if local healthcare access matters to you, since everything else here reads comfortably above average.
This suits someone who wants space, quiet, and a strong broadband connection more than they want a pub on the corner or a station at the end of the road — an established household, likely older given the median age near 49, with a car and no urgent need for a train commute. It would suit someone who's already decided the countryside is the point, not a compromise. It would not suit someone who wants daily amenities within reach or a heavily documented school record to lean on before deciding.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.