Village · 2,091 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Weeley scores 52/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for transport (73).
It scores lowest on health (24).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Weeley in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Weeley reads as detached houses on generous plots, hedges rather than walls, and cars parked on driveways rather than kerbs — the kind of village high street that exists mainly to service the surrounding farmland and commuter housing rather than to be visited. The median age here sits well above the national average, and it shows: this is a settled, older population rather than a place in flux, with the low turnover of a village where people move in and stay.
The practical picture is a genuine trade-off. Weeley has its own station, which matters more than it might elsewhere, since there's no dense bus network to lean on — the stop count is modest and the rail line is doing most of the connectivity work, backed up by an "A" grade for transport that feels earned rather than generous. Schooling is thinner: there's one mainstream school in the immediate data, Weeley St Andrew's CofE Primary, rated Good, plus a small independent special school. For secondary-age children you'd be looking beyond the village boundary. Housing leans heavily towards detached freehold homes — nineteen of the twenty-eight recent sales were detached, all freehold, no new-build noise at all — and at a median around £321,000 that's roughly a fifth above the wider Tendring district figure, so you're paying a premium for the detached-and-settled character rather than for the postcode.
Green space is where the numbers undersell the feel a little: the hectare count is low, but at this density — a fraction of the national average — the village doesn't feel short of room, gardens and paddocks doing the work that formal parks would do elsewhere. There isn't much of a restaurant or café scene to speak of in the data, which tracks with the character: this isn't a destination village, it's a residential one, and weekends here are more likely to be spent driving out to Colchester or the coast than staying local. On safety, the picture is textured rather than alarming: the overall grade sits comfortably in the B+ band alongside affordability and connectivity, but violence and sexual offences account for over half of recorded crime — worth noting precisely because it's the outlier against an otherwise unremarkable crime profile, and the trend itself is flat rather than worsening.
This suits people who've already decided they want space and quiet over convenience — a station to fall back on, a decent primary school, and enough detached housing stock that "For Sale" boards mean something specific here. It asks more of you if you need secondary schooling, nightlife, or a wide choice of eating out on your doorstep, and the older median age is a useful signal about the rhythm you'd be joining rather than a warning.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.