London Borough · 278,340 residents
Good · better than 1 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Council boundary
Waltham Forest scores 55/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is schools (64).
It scores lowest on affordability (23).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Waltham Forest in London, each measured against the national average.
Terraced streets dominate here, brick bay-fronted rows running off a high street that mixes Turkish grills, Caribbean bakeries and the odd craft coffee counter — the look of a place that's been quietly filling up with people priced out of Hackney rather than one built for a single type of resident. You'll see prams and delivery cyclists on the same pavement, market stalls, and a fair number of period conversions with the scaffolding still up.
Getting around is the strong suit: Walthamstow Central gives you Underground and rail options in one building, Highams Park adds another line out, and across the borough there are a dozen rail stations feeding into 573 transport stops in total — this is a place built around the commute, not against it. Schools are a genuinely mixed picture rather than a uniform story: Selwyn Primary carries an Outstanding rating, Walthamstow Academy posts a solidly positive progress score, but South Chingford Foundation School's is sharply negative, and the borough-wide Ofsted average sits close to the national norm rather than above it — so which street, and which catchment, matters more than the borough label. Housing follows the same terraced, freehold pattern the streets suggest: three-quarters of recent sales were houses rather than flats, freehold outnumbers leasehold, and a median price around £525,000 sits just under what the wider borough itself commands — cheaper than its own patch, if only slightly.
Green space is genuinely abundant — 280 sites and over 400 hectares between them, well above the national rate per head — and that, alongside a young median age of around 36, shapes the rhythm of free time: dog walks and five-a-side over destination dining, though the high street's cuisine mix (Turkish, Caribbean, Vietnamese) gives you plenty to choose from without leaving the area. The one grade that jars against an otherwise solid set — safety and health both rate well above the national average, connectivity too — is affordability, marked down clearly; rents above £1,700 and a house-price percentile in the high 80s nationally tell you this is no longer a budget corner of London, whatever the borough-relative discount suggests. Crime itself reads as flat year on year, with violence and anti-social behaviour the two categories doing most of the work, running a little above the parent borough's own rate rather than below it.
This suits someone who wants the commute and the schools-gamble-with-upside more than a guaranteed outcome — a young professional or growing family who'll do the legwork on which primary and which street, and who has priced in London-adjacent rents rather than bargain ones. It's a harder sell if affordability is your first filter, since that's the one grade here that doesn't match the rest of the story.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.