Suburb · 23 residents
Very good · better than 8 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Wallisdown scores 71/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (81) and environment (78).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Wallisdown in South West, each measured against the national average.
Wallisdown reads as a dense pocket of semis and terraces stitched between Bournemouth and Poole, the kind of place where a detached house still turns up on a For Sale board next to a run of flats, and nobody looks out of place either way. It's built-up rather than spacious — the population density here runs well above the national average — but it doesn't feel anonymous; this is a working suburb rather than a dormitory one, with a median age a touch below the regional norm, suggesting a slightly younger, more mixed crowd than the retirement-heavy pockets often found along this stretch of the coast.
The housing picture is the most telling thing about Wallisdown. Sales skew toward detached freehold homes, yet the median price sits meaningfully below both the Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole average and the national figure — this is a place where freehold ownership is the norm but the price ticket is lower than the wider unitary authority, which is unusual and worth sitting with. It points to a suburb that hasn't been swept up in the same premium as its neighbours, which cuts both ways: better value in, less certainty about how that value moves. Renters will notice the opposite pull — median rent here runs above the national figure, so the affordability story is really two stories, one for buyers and one for tenants.
Crime is where the numbers need a careful read rather than a fright. Violence and sexual offences top the local breakdown, followed closely by shoplifting and anti-social behaviour — a pattern that tracks with a dense, mixed-use suburb rather than anything to file as a hidden crisis. The safety grade sits solidly in line with the rest of the area's profile, not as an outlier, which matters more than any single raw count. Green space per head runs ahead of both the regional and national averages, so despite the density there's more open ground here than the postcode's crowded feel might suggest — a useful counterweight on a Saturday when you want somewhere to walk that isn't a car park.
Taken as a whole, the grades cluster tightly in the B to B+ range — safety, schools, connectivity, environment, nightlife all reading as comfortably above the national average, with affordability and health sitting a shade more middling. That's a rare thing: no single glaring weak spot, no outlier grade dragging the picture down, just a consistently decent suburb that happens to sit in one of the less affluent income bands nationally despite the respectable grades around it — worth noticing if household income, not just house price, is part of your calculation. This suits someone who wants proximity to Bournemouth and Poole without paying Bournemouth-and-Poole prices, and who doesn't mind a dense, ordinary street over a scenic one.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.