Neighbourhood · 5 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Waddington scores 48/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (91).
It scores lowest on food & drink (24) and health (24).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Waddington in London, each measured against the national average.
Waddington's streets are the kind with detached houses set back behind hedges, cars on the drive rather than the kerb, and very little passing footfall — this is a place people drive out of and back into, not a place they wander through. The houses vary in size but rarely in solidity; you won't find much new-build here, and the mature feel is deliberate rather than accidental.
The property picture backs this up: semi-detached houses on freehold titles dominate the sales here, and detached homes fetch a median of £760,000 against a national figure closer to £420,000 — a For Sale board here is announcing space and permanence, not a starter flat. That £746,000 median sits well above both the national and even the wider London average, and against Croydon, the borough it sits within, prices run over a quarter higher. Housing here has been essentially flat over the past year, so this isn't a market anyone's flipping — people buy in and stay, which fits a median age approaching 48, noticeably older than London as a whole. Schools are a mixed bag on paper: The Hayes Primary holds a Good rating, but Kenley Primary is rated as requiring improvement, and secondary options like Oasis Academy Coulsdon show a slightly negative progress score — worth checking catchment carefully rather than assuming quality by postcode alone. Transport is the one real constraint: a single stop serves the immediate area, so this suits someone who drives or doesn't mind a walk or connecting journey to reach a station, more than someone chasing a fast rail commute.
Green space and quiet dominate daily life here more than restaurants or nightlife — the connectivity and nightlife grades sit around average, suggesting this isn't where you go for an evening out, but somewhere you retreat to at the end of one. Health services score a little below what you'd hope for locally, worth factoring in if that matters to your household. What stands out instead is safety: violent and sexual offences make up the largest share of a relatively low crime count, but the overall rate runs some 60% below the Croydon average, and the safety grade here is the standout top mark against an otherwise solid-but-unremarkable set of scores — the quiet spine of the place. This is an area sitting in the ninth decile for both income and deprivation, meaning it's among the more comfortable, less pressured corners of London by national standards, even if the borough around it doesn't always carry that reputation.
Put together, this suits people who've already decided they want space, quiet and a sense of settledness over nightlife or a short commute — established households, possibly with older children already through primary school, who value a leafy, low-crime setting and are prepared to drive for most of what they need. It suits them less if a fast rail link or an evening scene nearby is non-negotiable; that trade-off is the one to sit with before committing.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.