Village · 1,857 residents
Excellent · among the highest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Upper Rissington scores 92/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as excellent — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (99) and environment (76).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Upper Rissington in South West, each measured against the national average.
Upper Rissington reads as a former RAF station quietly turned village estate — wide roads, a mix of detached family houses and semi-detached infill, the kind of place where cars outnumber pedestrians but nobody's in a hurry. There's no high street pretending to be a town centre here; this is a residential village that keeps its head down.
The practical picture is a straightforward one. The Rissington School, rated Good, serves as the local primary and covers the core of what families need without you having to think about it further. With a median age of 37.7 — younger than both the regional and national norms — this skews toward established families and younger professionals rather than retirees, though the transport offer is modest: eight local stops and no rail station in the immediate picture, so this is a driving village, not a commuting one. Housing is dominated by freehold detached and semi-detached houses, hardly any flats or new build, which tells you what a For Sale board here actually means — a family house you'll own outright, not a starter flat or a leasehold flip. At a median £367,000, it undercuts the wider Cotswold district by around 8%, though it sits close to the national and regional averages — this is mid-market by local standards, not a bargain, not a stretch.
Green space is generous relative to the population — eight sites across a village of under 1,600 people — so dog walks and school-run detours don't require a car journey. There isn't a restaurant scene to speak of in the data, and that fits the character: this is a place you leave for a proper night out, not one built around a pub-and-restaurant strip. The crime picture is where the story gets interesting against the area's otherwise glowing grades — an A+ for safety overall, yet the breakdown shows violence and sexual offences and burglary as the top two categories, ahead of shoplifting, which is unusual for a small village and worth sitting with rather than dismissing; the total volume is low and the trend is flat, so this isn't a place getting worse, but it's not the crime-free idyll the headline grade might suggest either. Health provision scores solidly (B+), broadband is decent with two-thirds full fibre coverage, and the overall texture — A+ overall, A-grade housing and environment, B+ on schools and connectivity — paints a comfortable, well-kept village with one rougher edge in its crime mix that the average grade smooths over.
Who ends up here tends to be people who've made peace with driving everywhere, want a house with a garden and freehold title rather than a flat, and are happy trading a train station and restaurant strip for quiet roads and a decent primary school. If your daily life depends on rail commuting or an evening restaurant scene on your doorstep, you'll feel the gap; if what you want is space, a stable market, and a village that isn't trying to be anything else, this is a fair, unshowy fit.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.