Town · 11,148 residents
Good · better than 5 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Ulverston scores 65/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (74) and safety (73).
It scores lowest on transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Ulverston in North West, each measured against the national average.
Ulverston's high street still has the look of a proper market town: terraced stone cottages, independent shopfronts, and a skyline anchored by the Hoad Monument up on the hill rather than anything glassy or new. It attracts an older crowd more than a young professional one — the median age here is nearly eight years above the national figure — and the pace on the ground matches that: unhurried, settled, more allotment than app-based delivery.
The practical picture is a mixed one, and worth sitting with. Ulverston Rail Station gives you a line out, but it's the only station serving the area and the transport grade lags well behind everything else here, so a car matters more than the town's walkable centre might suggest. Schools pull the opposite way: Sir John Barrow School holds an Outstanding rating, and with seven schools serving a population of under 6,000, there's real choice for a family settling here, even if Ulverston Victoria High School's exam progress figures sit slightly below the national average. Housing is where the numbers genuinely surprise: a median price of £195,000 is well under both the regional and national norms, and terraces — the dominant property type, mostly freehold — are trading noticeably below what a terrace fetches nationally. Against the wider Westmorland and Furness area it's pricier by a modest margin, but nationally this counts as accessible ground, decile 7 on the deprivation scale putting it comfortably on the better-off side without being exclusive.
Green space is genuinely abundant for the size of the place — thirty-eight sites and over 46 hectares to wander, which for a town this size is a lot of breathing room, and it shows in the environment grade sitting at the top of the scale. Health provision scores just as strongly. The one grade that jars against all this comfort is safety: violence and sexual offences make up over half of recorded crime, and the overall crime rate here runs almost double the parent authority's average — a genuinely odd note in an otherwise calm, green, well-schooled profile. It's worth weighing rather than ignoring, though the direction of travel is described as improving rather than worsening, which softens the read.
This suits someone who wants a slower, established life with hills and coast on the doorstep and doesn't need a fast commute — retirees, or those working locally or remotely, will find more to like than a young professional chasing a daily train south. Anyone weighing it up should sit with that safety figure and decide for themselves how much it changes the picture; on paper, everything else here reads as settled and good value.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.