Suburb · 235 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Tye Common scores 62/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (73) and property market (72).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Tye Common in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses behind long driveways, hedges trimmed into straight lines, the odd horsebox parked on gravel — Tye Common reads as settled, well-off Essex rather than commuter-belt hustle. This is not a place with a high street pulling in passing trade; it's a place people drive out to at the end of the day and close the gate behind them.
The numbers back up that first impression. Tye Common sits in the top income and deprivation decile nationally, and the median house price of £497,500 is half again what you'd pay across Basildon as a whole — detached homes here fetch £680,000 against a national detached average of £420,000, and with every recorded sale in the sample freehold, this is not a street of shared-ownership starter homes or leasehold flats. It's a place you buy into once, with equity, and stay. That fits the median age of nearly 49: this is not a young family's postcode so much as a settled-family or later-life one. Schooling is a mixed picture rather than a selling point — Quilters Infant and Junior schools serve the immediate area, and secondary-age children generally move on to The Billericay School, but Ofsted ratings for the local primaries aren't published and the overall schools grade sits at only C+, noticeably below the A-grade environment and safety scores that otherwise define the area. If schooling is your priority, it's worth checking current inspection reports rather than assuming the area's affluence carries through to its classrooms.
Green space is generous relative to the population — three sites covering nearly 56 hectares for just over 2,000 residents — which explains why weekends here tend to mean walking rather than dining out; the area doesn't carry a restaurant or nightlife scene, reflected in a C+ nightlife grade sitting well below everything else on the scorecard. Broadband is solid, with three-quarters of premises on full fibre, useful if working from one of those detached homes is part of the appeal. Safety is where the place quietly excels: an A grade, and while violence and sexual offences make up the largest single share of recorded crime, as they do almost everywhere, the overall volume across a population this size is low. Transport is the honest trade-off — a C+ grade, no rail station named in the immediate area, and a road-first way of life. You'll want a car, not a platform.
This suits people who've already made their money or are close to it, who want space, quiet, and a garden more than a bar or a train line, and who are prepared to drive their children to school and themselves to the station. It's a harder sell if you need walkable amenities, a strong state secondary on your doorstep, or a fast rail commute — the price tag assumes you've already solved for those elsewhere.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.