Tuxford in East Midlands has a Check Local Score of 71/100 (very good), drawn from official data on safety, schools, transport, housing, amenities and the local environment, each measured against the national average — a score of 60 is typical for the country.
Tuxford still reads as a market town in miniature: a wide main street, red-brick terraces and semis giving way to newer estates at the edges, and a population under 1,100 that means everyone's pace slows a notch. It's the kind of place where the housing stock looks older than it is and nobody's in a rush to change that.
Housing here tells its own story before you even see a for-sale board: nine of the last 21 sales were semi-detached, freehold is essentially the only tenure that trades, and a median price of £160,000 sits well below both the regional figure and the England-wide £281,000 — even against its own council area of Bassetlaw it's running nearly 19% cheaper. That affordability is the headline grade, and it shows: this is a place where a family can own a freehold semi for the price of a flat elsewhere. Schooling is a mixed picture rather than a simple win — Tuxford Academy, the secondary, is rated Good but posts a below-average Progress 8 score of -0.2, and the other two sampled schools have no published Ofsted grade at all, so you're weighing a solid but unremarkable set of options rather than a slam dunk. There's no rail station in the picture here, so this reads as a driving town: 29 local transport stops keep things moving at ground level, and the roads (not a station platform) are how most people actually get to work.
Green space is modest rather than generous — twelve pockets adding up to six hectares, thin against the national average of over eleven hectares per thousand people, so gardens and the surrounding countryside do more of the work than any single park. Health outcomes buck the town's otherwise middling economic position: a health grade of A stands out against an affordability and income picture that puts Tuxford in the more deprived third of the country nationally (income decile 2, IMD decile 3). That's the quiet tension in the data — a place that scores well on safety, transport, and wellbeing, but where wages and deprivation measures lag behind the comfortable, leafy image the streetscape suggests. Crime is dominated by one category, violence and sexual offences, which accounts for almost half of all recorded incidents, though the overall total across a year is low enough that it reads as a town of infrequent, sharp incidents rather than constant low-level trouble.
This suits someone who wants space and affordability over convenience — a driving commuter, a retiree, or a family who's done the sums on a freehold semi and decided the trade-off against thinner school ratings and limited transport links is worth it. It's a harder sell if you need a train platform at the end of your street or want your children's school choice to come with a guaranteed Outstanding badge; Tuxford asks you to value the quieter, cheaper, more self-contained version of small-town life instead.
Data last updated: 15 August 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.