Village · 2,146 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Timsbury scores 65/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (73).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Timsbury in South West, each measured against the national average.
Stone terraces and semi-detached cottages line the streets here, the kind of village where you'd pass more dog walkers than delivery vans, and where the housing stock still outnumbers anything resembling a retail strip. Timsbury doesn't announce itself; it's a place people settle into rather than pass through, and the median age of 48 tells you this is not a village full of first-time buyers finding their feet.
The practical picture is a mixed one worth sitting with. There's one school in the area, St Mary's CofE Primary, an academy with 155 pupils; no secondary option shows up locally, so families here are likely already planning on transport out for older children. That said, the transport grade is the standout in the whole profile — an A, well above the norm — with 19 stops serving a population of just 811, suggesting this is a village built around getting elsewhere easily rather than a place designed to be self-contained. Housing here leans firmly toward freehold semi-detached and terraced homes, no new-build estates, and prices running seven percent below the wider Bath and North East Somerset average, which itself isn't cheap. A median price around £362,500 puts Timsbury solidly in the upper half nationally, but comfortably under what you'd pay elsewhere in the unitary authority — the discount is real, not dramatic.
Green space is modest rather than generous — nine pockets adding up to seven hectares, enough for a walk but not for wide open country rambles — and with only one identified school and no restaurant or named venue data coming through, this doesn't read as a place with a bustling weekend circuit. What it does have is health: a grade of A, well above the national pattern, alongside strong marks for environment and housing. That's the quiet spine of this profile — a village that scores comfortably across the board except on one measure that deserves a straight look. Safety comes in at a solid B+, but the underlying numbers show violence and sexual offences accounting for nearly half of all recorded crime, and the crime rate itself runs more than double the rate of the wider council area. Forty incidents over a year in a village of 811 people isn't a large raw number, and shoplifting and criminal damage make up much of the rest, but it's worth weighing against the otherwise reassuring grade.
This is a village that suits people already settled into a rhythm — established homeowners, older couples, commuters who value fast connections more than footfall on a high street. It asks you to look past a single uncomfortable crime statistic to a broader picture of good health provision, decent transport, and freehold homes that undercut the regional market. Anyone weighing it up should visit for themselves and read the crime breakdown alongside the grades, not instead of them — the average here is genuinely good, but averages can hide edges.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.