Suburb · 49 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Three Crosses scores 75/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (77) and property market (76).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Three Crosses in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Detached and semi-detached houses sit side by side on wide plots here, the kind of streets where a For Sale board means a freehold family home rather than a flat changing hands — and with only 49 people counted in the immediate area, this is about as sparsely settled as suburbs get, more hamlet-in-waiting than high street.
The numbers back up that impression. Population density is a fraction of the national average, and the median age of 54 tells you this isn't a place filling up with young professionals or families with primary-age kids — it's settled, older, and likely to have been that way for some time. House prices sit close to the regional norm, with the local median a little above Herefordshire's typical figure, and semi-detached homes here trade at almost exactly the national semi-detached price, while detached houses run somewhat cheaper than the national detached average. Every recorded sale in the sample was freehold, which fits the character: this is a place of outright ownership, not rental churn, and the near-total freehold split plus a tiny new-build share suggests a settled housing stock rather than fresh development.
Crime is where the story gets interesting. The area carries an overall grade of A and a safety grade of A, with the trend marked as improving — yet the crime rate comparison against the Herefordshire parent shows a startling jump, and violence and sexual offences make up over a third of recorded incidents. This is very likely a small-numbers effect: with only a handful of actual incidents feeding into a tiny population base, percentages swing hard in either direction, and the area's low absolute crime count is probably the more honest read than the parent-comparison percentage. Anti-social behaviour and public order incidents round out the next largest shares, but none of it reads as a place with a visible problem — more a statistical quirk of a very small sample.
Connectivity and transport both score highly here, and full-fibre broadband reaches a large majority of premises, so remote work is a realistic proposition even without a rail station in the picture. Council tax on a Band D property runs close to the national median, which is unremarkable in a good way — no shock premium for living somewhere quiet. What you won't find is the infrastructure of a bigger suburb: no named schools or green spaces stand out in what's recorded, and the schools grade of B sits a touch below the otherwise gold-plated housing and safety picture, the one grade that breaks the pattern. If you're drawn to space, quiet, and a settled older community over amenity density, this fits; if you need schools and transport links spelled out in detail before committing, you'd want to dig further before deciding.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.