Village · 350 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Civil parish boundary
Thornhaugh scores 44/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (76) and affordability (73).
It scores lowest on transport (31).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Thornhaugh in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Thornhaugh is the sort of place where a terraced cottage on a quiet lane counts as the local housing stock, not the exception — small, close-knit, and built at a scale that predates the idea of a bypass. There's no visible high street pulse to speak of here; this is a village that keeps its head down, with a population under a thousand spread thinly across the fields, and the kind of quiet that comes from low density rather than careful planning.
The numbers behind the doors tell a fairly settled story. Median age sits just under 40, roughly in line with the national figure, which suggests a mix of long-term residents and families rather than a place skewed heavily toward retirees or twenty-somethings starting out. Housing here is overwhelmingly freehold and terraced — nine of the eighteen recorded sales were terraces — which is unusual for a village this small and points to an older core of housing rather than executive new-builds; there's been no new-build activity at all recently. Prices reflect that: a median of around £228,000 sits well below both the regional average and the wider East of England figures, and Thornhaugh actually undercuts even its own parent authority, Peterborough, on price. For a commuter, the practical picture is thinner than the price might suggest — transport here scores modestly, and without a standout local rail option to point to, this reads as a place you'd drive from rather than time your day around a platform.
Safety is the quiet spine of this one. The overall grade is a solid B, safety itself is graded B and holding flat year on year, yet the crime rate here actually runs about 18% higher than the Peterborough average, driven mostly by violence and anti-social behaviour rather than burglary or theft — the numbers are small in absolute terms (a few dozen incidents across a year), but in a village of under a thousand people, that shifts the local rate more than it would in a town. Green space is present but genuinely tight — under half a hectare recorded locally, which is low even by the standards of a village this size, so this isn't a place built around a park or common. Health provision scores a middling C+, worth weighing if you're planning to lean on local services rather than travel for them.
Put together, Thornhaugh suits someone who wants affordability and quiet over convenience — a settled, low-density spot where the housing is older and cheaper than the regional norm, the crime picture is mostly noise rather than serious threat, but where you'll be driving for most day-to-day needs rather than walking to them. It's a place to live deliberately, not to land in by accident.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.