Neighbourhood · 7 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Tanners Brook scores 48/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is affordability (68).
It scores lowest on health (30).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Tanners Brook in South East, each measured against the national average.
Tanners Brook is a dense pocket of flats and semis packed into just over a square kilometre, closer in feel to inner-city terracing than the South East's commuter-belt image — the sort of place where you notice how tightly the streets sit together before you notice anything else. It attracts a working-age, youngish crowd rather than families settling in for the long haul; the median age here is under 38, several years younger than the regional norm, and the flat-heavy housing stock backs that up.
The practical picture is mixed in a way that rewards a closer look rather than a glance at the headline grade. Two rail stations, Millbrook and Redbridge, give you options for getting into Southampton without a car, and connectivity here is genuinely strong — full fibre reaches the vast majority of homes, which matters if you work from home some of the week. Schools are a thinner story: Tanners Brook Primary is the named option and it's an academy without a published Ofsted rating in this data, so you'd want to visit rather than take a grade on faith. Housing is where the numbers get interesting — the median price sits close to the national average and noticeably below both the regional figure and the wider Southampton benchmark, but the property mix tells the real story: flats dominate the sales here yet sell for well under the national flat price, while the smaller number of semis and terraces actually fetch a premium over their national equivalents. A "for sale" board here most often means a leasehold flat priced to move, sitting alongside a minority of freehold houses that hold their value better.
Green space is modest — five plots totalling under seven hectares, which is thin against both regional and national averages, so this isn't an area built around long park walks. What stands out more starkly is safety: the overall grade lands at a middling C+, in line with schools and health, while transport and connectivity both grade comfortably higher — a B or better. That gap is the area's quiet spine. The crime rate itself, when set against Southampton as a whole, runs sharply higher, and violent and sexual offences alone account for well over a third of recorded incidents, with public order and drugs making up much of the rest. The five-year trend on safety is described as flat rather than worsening, which is some reassurance that this is a settled pattern rather than a slide, but it's not a figure to skim past.
Put together, this suits someone who prioritises transport links and connectivity over green space and wants housing costs a notch below the regional going rate, and who has weighed the crime figures with open eyes rather than glossing over them. It's less suited to anyone whose first ask is outstanding schools or a quiet, park-adjacent street — those buyers will find better matches elsewhere in the South East. The trade-off here is legible rather than hidden: you're paying less and connecting well, in exchange for a safety picture that needs honest consideration before you commit.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.