Suburb · 77 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Sutton Forest Side scores 53/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (85).
It scores lowest on health (14).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Sutton Forest Side in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Terraced brick rows dominate here, tightly packed, almost all of them freehold, and the kind of streets where a "For Sale" board tends to mean a first purchase rather than a forever home. Sutton Forest Side sits within Ashfield, and it reads as a working, unpretentious pocket of the district — the sort of place that attracts young households and first-time buyers rather than anyone chasing polish.
The numbers back up that impression. Median age here is 33.3, a good deal younger than the national figure of 40.4, and the terraced houses that make up most sales come at a median price of £112,000 — roughly a third less than Ashfield's own average, and a fraction of the national terrace price. This is a decile-1 area on both income and deprivation measures, which places it among the most stretched pockets of the country economically, though the affordability grade sits at a respectable B+ precisely because housing costs are so low relative to what you get. Croft Primary School, a community school with 386 pupils, is the named school on the ground, though no Ofsted rating is listed to say more about it. There's no rail station in the picture either, so this reads as a car-and-bus area rather than a commuter-line one.
Green space and environment score strongly here — an A grade — even though no single named park stands out in the data, and that combination of high population density (well above the national average) with decent environmental quality suggests a place that's built up but not devoid of breathing room. Health comes in at a solid B. What doesn't fit the pattern is nightlife, graded C+, and safety, which sits at B+ overall despite violence and sexual offences accounting for over a third of recorded crime — the single largest category by some margin, with anti-social behaviour a distant second. The safety trend is flat, meaning this isn't a place getting sharply better or worse, just steady.
Put together, this suits people for whom low entry cost matters more than polish — first-time buyers, young single people or couples, anyone who values a cheap freehold terrace over a commute-friendly rail link or a buzzing high street. It won't suit someone chasing strong school data to reassure them, since that picture is thin here, or anyone wanting nightlife or the reassurance of a low crime count backing up a safety grade. The honest read is a young, dense, affordable corner of Ashfield — not without its rough edges, but not spiralling either.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.