Neighbourhood · 20 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Streatham Vale scores 40/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is infrastructure (64).
It scores lowest on affordability (24) and food & drink (36).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Streatham Vale in London, each measured against the national average.
Streatham Vale reads as a street of terraces and low-rise conversions, the kind of place where the housing stock looks more suburban than the postcode's population density suggests. Streets are packed tighter than you'd guess from the outside — semis and terraces giving way to flats near the main roads — and the mix attracts a fairly young crowd, median age a touch under 40, more likely renting or buying their first flat than settling in for the long haul.
Streatham Common handles the rail commute, and it's the area's one clear transport asset, though with a single line into the area you're leaning on it rather than choosing between options. Schools carry real weight here: Woodmansterne School runs all-through, and alongside Granton Primary and Immanuel and St Andrew Church of England Primary, the picture is solid enough that families don't feel they're settling. Housing itself splits fairly evenly between flats and terraces, sold mostly freehold, and a terrace here fetches close to three times the national median for the same property type — this is inner-London pricing wearing a suburban coat. Against Lambeth as a whole you're paying roughly the same, which tells you this isn't a discount corner of the borough, just a different texture of it.
The green space is modest — under 4 hectares spread across eight pockets, thin compared to the borough average, so this isn't an area built around big park afternoons. What you get instead is a practical, unglamorous rhythm: local shops, a short list of places to eat, healthcare that's rated respectably but not exceptionally. Where the picture gets more complicated is safety. The borough-wide comparison actually favours Streatham Vale — crime here runs below the Lambeth rate — but the local trend itself is moving the wrong way, with violence and anti-social behaviour together accounting for over half of all recorded incidents. It's the one grade that jars against an otherwise steady set: solid on schools, solid on housing quality, respectable on connectivity, then a dip that's worth sitting with rather than skating past.
Affordability is the other pressure point. Incomes here sit well below the national spread even as house prices sit near the 90th percentile nationally — a gap that shapes who can actually settle rather than just visit. It suits people who've made peace with paying London terrace prices for a flat, who want a rail link into the city without needing three of them, and who value decent local schools over an active nightlife or acres of parkland. It's a harder sell for anyone chasing green space or drawn by a bargain, and the worsening safety trend is the detail to ask around about rather than take on faith.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.