Town · 294,770 residents
Very good · better than 7 in 10 towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Council boundary
Stockport scores 71/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (75).
Safety isn't scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Stockport in North West, each measured against the national average.
Stockport town centre has that unmistakable mix of Victorian red-brick terraces, a market hall that's older than most cities' entire footprint, and a viaduct that dominates the skyline whether you like it or not. It's a proper town rather than a satellite dormitory — the kind of place with its own high street identity, its own grammar school, its own pull, even as Manchester's gravity sits right there on the doorstep.
The practical picture here is solidly middle-of-the-road in the best sense. With twenty rail stations serving the wider area and stops like Woodsmoor and Hazel Grove offering direct lines into Manchester, this suits someone who wants city-salary work without city-centre living. Schools follow a similar pattern — Stockport School posts a respectable positive Progress 8 score, Great Moor Infant and St Simon's Catholic Primary both carry Good ratings, and if you want Outstanding specifically you're looking toward Ladybrook Primary or, for secondary, Laurus Cheadle Hulme. None of this is spectacular, but a median age of 42 tells you who's actually settled here: people past the flat-share years, many with kids already in the system rather than just planning for one. Housing matches that story — semi-detached freeholds dominate the market here, the classic three-bed-with-a-garden that this age group buys and stays in, and at a median price of £295,000 you're sitting almost exactly on the national average, a touch below what the wider Stockport metropolitan area commands.
Green space is where the numbers quietly outperform the vibe you'd expect from a former mill town — over 1,600 hectares of it, spread across some 640 named spaces, which is generous even against regional norms. That shapes the weekend rhythm more than any restaurant strip does: dog walks, park football, the market hall for a lazy lunch rather than a curated food scene. Health outcomes and connectivity both sit at solidly-above-average grades, and full fibre reaches most homes now, which matters if you're one of the many hybrid commuters this kind of town increasingly attracts. The one grade that breaks the pattern is safety — violence and sexual offences account for two-thirds of recorded crime here, and while the overall rate runs slightly below the metropolitan district average, it's the sub-grade that stops this being an unqualified "A" across the board. Worth knowing, not worth panicking over.
Who fits here: people who've done their time in Manchester's inner-ring flats and want a garden, a train into the city, and a school place that doesn't require a miracle. It's not cheap enough to be a bargain nor pricey enough to feel exclusive — decile 6 on deprivation, decile 4 on income, comfortably ordinary in the most reassuring sense. The regret risk is low if what you wanted was competent and settled; it's higher if you were hoping for nightlife or a fast-changing, up-market trajectory, because Stockport isn't chasing that.
Safety isn’t scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.