Suburb · 1,922 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
St Peter's scores 78/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (77) and health (75).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for St Peter's in South West, each measured against the national average.
Terraced Victorian streets, a scatter of semis, and the kind of density that tells you this is inner Cheltenham rather than its outskirts — St Peter's has the packed-in, walk-everywhere feel of a suburb built before the car, now filled with a mix of young professionals and longer-term residents rather than one obvious type.
The numbers back up that impression: at 3,958 people per square kilometre it's noticeably denser than both the national and South West averages, and a median age of 35.1 is a good decade younger than the regional norm of 44 — this reads as a place that skews toward people starting out rather than settling down for the long haul. Housing here is dominated by terraces on freehold titles, which is the classic starter-home or first-step-up pattern, and at a median of £290,000 it sits a touch above the national median but comfortably below Cheltenham as a whole, about 9% cheaper than the town it belongs to. Schools are thin on the ground — Gardners Lane Primary and Pittville School are the names attached to the area, with Pittville's GCSE progress score sitting a little above the expected national line — so this isn't a suburb bursting with choice, more one with a couple of solid, known quantities.
Green space is respectable rather than abundant — seven pieces of it totalling 14 hectares, which works out generously per resident given the population is only just over two thousand — and full-fibre broadband reaching 84% of homes suggests plenty of people working from at least some of the week. The overall grade pattern is a consistent B-plus across affordability, connectivity, housing, transport and schools, with the environment grade nudging up to an A — the one outlier worth pausing on is safety, graded in line with the rest at B-plus but sitting against a crime count where violence and anti-social behaviour together account for over half of recorded incidents. That's not unusual for a dense inner-suburb, and the trend line is described as improving, but it's the detail that separates the postcard from the reality on the ground.
This suits someone who wants proximity over acreage — a short commute into Cheltenham's centre, a period terrace rather than a new-build box, and a street life busy enough that you're rarely short of a corner shop or a bus stop, of which there are thirteen scattered locally. It asks you to trade some quiet for that convenience, and to do your own homework on schooling given how few options sit inside the boundary. Anyone drawn to a slower, greener retirement-style suburb should look elsewhere in the town; anyone happy with density, younger neighbours, and a still-improving safety picture will likely find it comfortable enough.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.