Neighbourhood · 18 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
St. Martin in the Fields scores 72/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for food & drink (99) and health (97).
It scores lowest on affordability (13) and safety (35).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for St. Martin in the Fields in London, each measured against the national average.
Trafalgar Square sits at the edge of this postcode, and the streets around it feel less like a residential suburb than a stage set that a small number of people happen to live behind. Theatres, government buildings, and tourist flows dominate the pavements; the few residents here are outnumbered many times over by the people passing through. It attracts a particular kind of resident — someone who wants Zone 1 as an address rather than a lifestyle, who doesn't mind sharing their doorstep with crowds heading to Leicester Square of an evening.
Transport is about as good as London gets: Charing Cross Underground and mainline stations sit right on top of the area, with Leicester Square and Piccadilly Circus Underground stations also within the same small patch, so the connectivity grade here is genuinely one of the best you'll find anywhere in the capital. Schools carry a strong average Ofsted rating too, though with a population of only a few hundred and a median age of 38, this reads less as a family suburb and more as a place for professionals and older residents without school runs to plan around. Housing is almost entirely leasehold flats — the handful of recent sales were nearly all flats, one freehold among them — and at a median price north of a million pounds, well above even Westminster's already steep borough average, a for-sale board here is selling scarcity and location, not space or garden.
The green space is a single small pocket of under half a hectare, so weekend life isn't built around parks; it's built around what the area actually offers, which is theatre, restaurants, and central London's cultural core on your doorstep. What's harder to ignore is the safety picture: crime levels here run enormously higher than the Westminster average, driven overwhelmingly by theft from the person and other theft — the classic pickpocketing pattern of a dense tourist zone rather than a sign of a dangerous residential street. It's a strange split — an A+ for health and nightlife, an A for schools and transport, but a D for both safety and affordability sitting right alongside them. That's the quiet spine of this place: extraordinary access, real cultural richness, the top rung of connectivity, but you're paying a premium to live inside a crime statistic that's really about visitors, not neighbours.
This suits someone who wants to be at the absolute centre of London life, who works irregular hours near the West End or simply wants to walk out into theatre and river views, and who's made peace with paying leasehold flat prices for a location rather than a home. It's a harder sell for anyone wanting a quiet street, a garden, or a place that feels like it belongs to residents rather than to everyone passing through.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.