Suburb · 534 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Spring Gardens scores 51/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for property market (70).
It scores lowest on food & drink (16).
Safety isn't scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Spring Gardens in North West, each measured against the national average.
Spring Gardens is terraced streets, close-packed housing, and a population density that towers over the national average — this is a tight, urban-grained corner of Salford, not a suburb with room to breathe. The sample size is small and the picture correspondingly bare in places, but what's there tells a clear story.
On paper the overall grade sits at a comfortable B+, with connectivity, environment and housing all scoring well above the national average. Sit that against an income and deprivation decile of 1 — among the most deprived areas nationally — and you get the quiet spine of this piece: a place that *feels* functional and well-connected day to day, while sitting at the sharp end of the national income distribution. That contrast is worth holding onto rather than resolving.
Housing tells its own version of the same story. The one sale on record came in at £140,000 for a freehold terrace, against a national median north of £280,000 — Spring Gardens prices around 36% below its own parent authority of Salford, itself already one of the more affordable metropolitan districts in the country. Terraced, freehold, unglamorous: a For Sale board here is pitched at first-time buyers and landlords rather than anyone trading up from a semi. Rent, interestingly, runs slightly above the national median at £1,164 — a gap worth asking a local agent about, since it doesn't sit comfortably with the sale price.
Schooling is thin on named detail — Dukesgate Academy, a sponsor-led primary with 226 pupils, is the one entry in the sample, and its Ofsted rating isn't recorded here. The area's own schools grade of B is respectable without being exceptional, roughly in line with national norms. With a median age of 29.8 — a decade younger than the national 40.4 — this reads as a place with young households and families with small children rather than one geared around retirement or empty-nesters, even if the specific commute and school pipeline aren't fully visible from here.
Crime is recorded at zero for the past twelve months, which, taken alongside the B+ environment and connectivity grades, points to streets that feel orderly and well looked-after despite the deprivation numbers — infrastructure and upkeep ahead of income, in other words. Full fibre reaches 87% of the area, well ahead of the national picture, so working from home or streaming isn't the constraint here that it might be in similarly priced areas elsewhere.
Put together, this is a place for someone who wants outright affordability and a younger, settled residential feel, and who isn't bothered by the absence of nightlife (the C+ grade is the one visible soft spot) or by close, dense streets rather than open suburban space. The trade-off is real: you're buying into a low-income area with strong practical bones — safety, broadband, housing cost — rather than one with much in the way of evening life or deep school data to lean on.
Safety isn’t scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.