Neighbourhood · 15,355 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
South Tottenham scores 45/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
No topic reaches "very good" (70+); its best is schools (66).
It scores lowest on affordability (20).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for South Tottenham in London, each measured against the national average.
Terraced streets dominate here, brick-fronted and tightly packed, with a density that outstrips almost anywhere else in the country outside inner London proper — this is a place built for people, not gardens. You'll notice the mix quickly: independent Orthodox Jewish schools sit blocks from community primaries, and the shopfronts along the main roads read as much Yiddish and Turkish as English. It doesn't feel manicured, and it isn't trying to.
Three rail stations serve the area, including South Tottenham itself and Seven Sisters, which puts you within easy striking distance of central London without a change — useful if you work in the City or the West End and don't want a long evening commute. Gladesmore Community School and a handful of primaries cover the state side, though published outcomes are mixed rather than exceptional, and Ofsted judgements for most local schools aren't currently published, which is worth checking directly before you commit. The housing stock is heavily terraced and roughly split down the middle between freehold and leasehold, with a median sale price around £513,500 — a touch below the Haringey borough average, which itself sits comfortably above the London and national medians. A For Sale board here is more likely to be a Victorian terrace than a new-build flat: only 2% of recent sales were new construction.
Green space is modest rather than absent — 27 patches totalling under 14 hectares, which works out thinner per head than the London average given how many people live in each square kilometre. Day to day, that means parks function as pocket relief rather than weekend destinations, and social life leans on the high street rather than open ground. The area's nightlife and connectivity both grade well above the national average, and full-fibre broadband reaches most homes, so it functions well for anyone working from home some of the week. The one figure that cuts against the otherwise decent grade pattern is safety: crime sits more than double the borough's already-elevated rate, driven by anti-social behaviour and violence rather than burglary or car crime, and it's been flat for a year rather than improving. Income and deprivation deciles sit near the bottom nationally, which tracks with the affordability grade — a D+ that reflects rents near £2,210 a month against a local wage base that doesn't always stretch to match.
This suits someone who wants a genuine commuter link into London, doesn't need much garden or green space to feel settled, and is comfortable in a dense, mixed, occasionally rough-edged urban setting rather than a quiet one. It's a harder sell if personal safety statistics weigh heavily on your decision, or if you're budgeting tightly against local incomes rather than a London-wide salary.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.