Village · 731 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Sherington scores 62/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (83).
It scores lowest on health (36).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Sherington in South East, each measured against the national average.
Sherington is the kind of place where a For Sale board looks slightly out of place — detached houses on freehold plots, few of them changing hands in any given year, and no new-build scaffolding to speak of. This is a village in the fullest sense: a scatter of two dozen or so households, stone and brick frontages, and a population density so low it barely registers against the Milton Keynes sprawl it technically belongs to. The people you'll see about are older on average than most of England, and that shapes the atmosphere more than any single amenity does — this isn't a place geared around nightlife or churn, it's geared around staying put.
The practical picture is thin by design rather than neglect. There's one school, Sherington Church of England School, a small voluntary controlled primary with only a couple of dozen pupils on its books — the kind of school where your child would be known by name within a week, though there's no Ofsted rating attached to judge it against anywhere else. Transport is modest: a handful of stops rather than a station, so this reads as a driving village, not a commuter one. Housing leans firmly detached and firmly freehold, with a median sale price sitting noticeably above both the national figure and the wider Milton Keynes benchmark — you're paying a premium here for space and quiet rather than for proximity to a platform.
Day-to-day life is compact. Green space is present but not extensive — a few small pockets rather than a sprawling common — which fits a place where daily life happens indoors or in gardens more than in public parks. The crime figures need reading carefully: the annual total is barely a handful of incidents, but because the resident population is so small, the rate per head comes out far above the Milton Keynes average — an artefact of tiny numbers rather than a lived sense of danger, and it tracks with the area's own safety grade sitting solidly mid-table rather than alarming. Broadband is a genuine strength — full-fibre coverage here is excellent, better than you'd expect from the rural setting, so working from home is a realistic option even without a rail link. The general character grades — environment rated well above average, affordability and connectivity both comfortably ahead of the national norm — paint a village that's quietly better-resourced than its size would suggest, with health services the one area that only tracks the middle of the pack rather than leading it.
This suits someone who has already decided they want space, quiet, and a strong broadband connection over transport links and choice of shops — likely a household with a car, no urgent school-run demands beyond one small primary, and no need to be near a station platform each morning. It's less suited to anyone wanting daily variety on the doorstep, or a fast rail commute; you'd be trading both for elbow room and a genuinely small-scale community.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.