Neighbourhood · 38 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Scott Green scores 53/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for affordability (73) and infrastructure (71).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Scott Green in Yorkshire and The Humber, each measured against the national average.
Scott Green is rows of semi-detached houses on quiet streets, the kind of place where the front gardens are tidy and the cars parked outside are a few years old rather than new. It's a small pocket — barely five hundred people — and the median age sitting well above the national figure tells you this isn't a place full of shared houses and young professionals cycling through short lets. This is a settled corner, where people tend to stay.
The housing stock backs that up: sales here are dominated by semi-detached homes, almost entirely freehold, and when a board goes up it's usually for a family house rather than a flat conversion or new-build — there's essentially no new-build activity at all. Prices sit modestly below the Leeds average and well under the national median, which puts Scott Green in reach for buyers priced out of the city centre without pushing them into bargain-basement territory. Birchfield Primary School serves the immediate area, though its latest inspection rating isn't published in a way that lets you read the room on that one. Council tax bands run slightly under both the regional and national Band D averages, another small mark in the affordability column.
Green space per head runs ahead of both the regional and national norms, so there's more breathing room here than the numbers for population density might suggest — packed in as houses are, the immediate area doesn't feel starved of open ground. Broadband is a genuine strength: full fibre coverage above 92% means working from home is a realistic, comfortable option, which matters given how many residents here look to be past the commuter-into-town stage of life. Healthcare and connectivity grades both sit solidly in the upper-B range, consistent with a place that functions well day to day without being flashy about it.
The one figure that needs unpacking honestly is crime. Set against Leeds as a whole, the local rate reads dramatically higher, and violence and sexual offences account for the largest single share of incidents, with shoplifting and other theft following behind — a pattern that often reflects a small residential count sitting near a busier retail or through-route area, where crime gets recorded locally but isn't necessarily generated by the residential population itself. The safety grade lands in the middle of the pack, trending flat rather than worsening, which suggests this is a known, stable pattern rather than a place sliding in the wrong direction. It's worth sitting with rather than dismissing, but it shouldn't be read in isolation from a broader picture that includes strong connectivity, reasonable affordability, and decent access to green space.
This suits people looking for settled, unglamorous suburban living — a freehold semi, a fibre connection, a patch of green nearby — more than it suits anyone chasing nightlife or a fast commuter line into the centre. The trade-off is that safety figure: worth a longer look at the crime breakdown for your specific street before committing, rather than taking the headline number at face value either way.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.