Village · 273 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Saxlingham Nethergate scores 58/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (88) and affordability (73).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and health (39).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Saxlingham Nethergate in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses behind hedges, gravel drives, the odd horsebox parked up for the winter — this is a village built around space rather than passing trade. There's no high street rhythm here to speak of; it's the kind of place people drive into rather than through.
The numbers behind that impression tell a consistent story. With a median age pushing 55 against a national figure closer to 40, this is a settled, older population rather than a village cycling through young families — and the property market backs that up: detached freehold houses dominate what little turns over, with a median sale price of £550,000 against South Norfolk's £295,500, putting Saxlingham Nethergate roughly 86% above its own district on price. That's not a starter-home village. The one school in the payload, Saxlingham Nethergate CofE VC Primary, is a small voluntary controlled school with just over 50 pupils — the kind of place where your child would be known by name, though there's no Ofsted rating on record to lean on. Transport is graded C, and there's no rail station in the picture here, so this reads as a driving village, not a commuter one.
Green space is modest in raw terms — five plots totalling a little over five hectares — but for a population this size that goes a long way, and the environment grade sits at the top of the scale. Eating out and nightlife aren't really what this postcode is for; the B grade on nightlife likely reflects a pub or two rather than a scene, and you'd be heading elsewhere in South Norfolk for a proper choice of restaurants. Healthcare access earns a solid but unspectacular B, which fits a rural village pattern — fine for routine needs, less convenient if you want a walk-in option on your doorstep.
Safety is where this place quietly stands out: an A+ grade and a flat trend, with the raw crime count so low that even a single violent or sexual offence swings the percentage breakdown. That's the out-of-pattern note worth sitting with — not a warning, but a reminder that small numbers make dramatic-looking statistics; nine incidents over a year in a village this size is not a pattern of danger. Affordability is graded A nationally, which sounds generous until you remember the £550,000 median is a local affordability story about income (this is a top-decile income area) rather than about cheap housing. This suits people who've already arrived somewhere in life — established, car-owning, wanting quiet and space over convenience — and would frustrate anyone hoping for a walkable commute, a lively evening scene, or an entry-level foothold on the property ladder.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.