Village · 226 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Roydon scores 51/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (80).
It scores lowest on transport (31) and infrastructure (35).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Roydon in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Roydon's houses sit apart from each other on generous plots, the sort of place where a For Sale board almost always says "detached" and "freehold" underneath it, and where nobody's shouting distance from their neighbour. This is a small, quiet corner of Norfolk rather than a commuter dormitory — the population here is tiny, the median age is well into the fifties, and the whole feel is of a settled, established community rather than a place in flux.
There isn't a rail station or a named school in the picture here, and the connectivity and transport grades reflect that — this is a place you drive from, not one you commute out of on a fixed timetable. What the data does make clear is the property picture: detached homes on freehold titles dominate absolutely, sale prices at the upper end stretch well past £680,000, and the median sits around £363,500 — comfortably above both the regional and national medians, and some 36% above the wider King's Lynn and West Norfolk district average. This is not a starter-home village; it's one where people tend to arrive with equity already built up elsewhere.
Green space here is modest and specific rather than sprawling — there's a single named plot of under half a hectare, so this isn't a village built around parkland, more one where gardens do the work that a public green might elsewhere. Health outcomes score strongly against the national picture, and safety does too: the crime count over the past year is negligible in absolute terms, even if violence and sexual offences make up the bulk of the handful of incidents recorded — a pattern common to small, low-crime areas where a single category can dominate the percentages without meaning much in practice. The trend is flat, which in a village this size simply means nothing much changes year to year.
The overall impression is of a well-off, low-density, distinctly grown-up village — strong on health and safety, weaker on connectivity and transport, and priced for people who've already made their money rather than those starting out. It suits residents who want space, quiet, and a slower rhythm, and who aren't relying on trains or bus routes to get through the week. Anyone needing tight transport links or a lively year-round social scene on the doorstep will find the essentials thin here; anyone wanting room to breathe at a price that reflects it will find the picture consistent throughout.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.