Village · 926 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Rotherfield scores 74/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (89) and environment (72).
It scores lowest on food & drink (27).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Rotherfield in South East, each measured against the national average.
Rotherfield reads as the kind of village where the parking outside the shop is nose-to-tail with Range Rovers and Volvos, and the housing stock is dominated by detached houses that rarely change hands. It sits up on the High Weald, the sort of place people move to rather than pass through, and the median age in the mid-fifties tells you this isn't a village humming with young families and school runs so much as one settled into itself.
The property picture backs that up: sales here are almost entirely freehold, detached homes, with a median sale price well north of half a million — comfortably pricier than the Wealden district average, which is itself one of the more expensive corners of the South East. There's no new-build to speak of, which means what's on the market is largely older housing, bought outright rather than leveraged into. Schooling is thin on the ground within the village itself — Rotherfield Primary is the one local option, alongside Jarvis Brook Primary nearby — so this reads more as a place families settle once children are past primary age, or commute their kids out for secondary schooling. With nine transport stops but no rail station listed in the village, getting to London or Tunbridge Wells is more likely a drive-and-park-and-ride affair than a walk-to-the-platform one.
Green space is generous relative to the tiny population — five plots across a fair spread of hectares for a village of well under a hundred people by these figures — so the rhythm here leans towards walking, gardens, and the pub rather than restaurant rows or nightlife. Crime is low in absolute terms, just a couple of dozen incidents across the year, though violence and anti-social behaviour still make up the bulk of what there is, which is fairly typical for a small, tight-knit place rather than a sign of trouble. The overall grade pattern is unusually consistent — strong on safety, environment, health, and transport connectivity, solid rather than exceptional on schools — with nothing sticking out as a weak link, which itself is worth noting: there's no hidden catch dragging the place down.
This suits people who've already made their money and want quiet, space, and a garden more than convenience — retirees, established professionals working from home, or families who don't mind driving for both the school run and the station. It's harder to make the case for someone who needs a short commute into London on a daily basis, or who wants a evening scene on the doorstep. The trade-off is straightforward: you're paying a premium, well above both the regional and national norm, for calm, greenery, and low crime, not for proximity to anything much.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.