Neighbourhood · 19,048 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Roehampton scores 62/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (87).
It scores lowest on affordability (23) and food & drink (38).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Roehampton in London, each measured against the national average.
Roehampton reads as two places stitched together: tower blocks and estate greenery on one side, university halls and independent school grounds on the other. It's dense — properly dense, more crowded than the London average — but you wouldn't always feel it, because so much of the ground here is given over to grass and trees rather than pavement. The mix of people reflects that split character: students drifting between Roehampton University buildings, families on the estates, and a smaller set of households who've bought into the leafier pockets near Richmond Park.
The commute is serviceable rather than slick — the transport grade sits in the middle of the pack, and there's no rail station anchoring the area, so most people are working with buses into Putney or Wandsworth for their onward connections. Schools are a genuine strength: Sacred Heart Catholic Primary holds a Good rating, and Ibstock Place School's presence signals that independent education is part of the local fabric, not an anomaly. Housing tells a split story too — flats and leasehold deals dominate the sales here, forty-three of the last batch against twenty-six terraces, and a For Sale board is far more likely to be advertising a leasehold flat than a freehold house. At a median of £596,000, Roehampton sits a little above its Wandsworth parent, though comfortably below the wider region's price ceiling — this is a borough where the money is, and Roehampton is one of its more attainable corners rather than one of its most expensive.
That affordability grade of D+ is worth sitting with: incomes locally sit right at the bottom decile nationally, which is a real tension against six-figure property prices and £2,611 median rents. It's the one figure in this picture that jars against the otherwise comfortable B-grade overall — a reminder that a nice postcode doesn't mean an easy one to afford on a local wage. Green space, on the other hand, is where Roehampton overperforms almost everyone: thirty-five green spaces and over a hundred hectares of them, well ahead of both the London and national averages per head, with Richmond Park on the doorstep shaping how people spend their free time — dog walks, running routes, picnics on a scale most London suburbs can't offer.
Safety is trending the right way, even if the numbers need context: violence and anti-social behaviour make up the bulk of recorded crime, which is typical for a dense inner-London suburb rather than a specific red flag, and the borough-wide comparison shows Roehampton running only slightly above Wandsworth's crime rate. This suits someone who wants green space and reasonable schools within a proper city borough, and who can absorb rent or a leasehold flat price that doesn't map neatly onto typical local wages — students, university staff, and established buyers rather than those stretching from a standing start.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.