Village · 2,035 residents
Good · better than 8 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Richings Park scores 69/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (78) and environment (71).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Richings Park in South East, each measured against the national average.
Richings Park reads as low, hedge-lined and settled — wide plots, mature trees, cars on the drive rather than the kerb, the kind of streets where a For Sale board tends to go up in spring and be gone within weeks. It's a village in the technical sense rather than the postcard one: no obvious high street clutter, just houses doing the talking.
That housing stock tells its own story. Semi-detached homes on freehold titles dominate what little turns over here — almost the whole recent sample was freehold, and detached and semi-detached properties between them account for most sales — which is the classic signature of a settled ownership market rather than a rental churn. At a median approaching £762,000, against a national median around £281,000 and even Buckinghamshire's own £450,000, this sits well above both its county and its country; the area sits in the top income decile and near the top of the deprivation scale in the least-deprived sense, so the price tag is consistent with who already lives here rather than a stretch for what's on offer. With a median age of 41 and one rail station serving the village, the practical shape is a household that's past the flat-share years, driving or taking a short rail hop rather than commuting by bus, and not especially price-sensitive about the school run or the season ticket.
Green space is modest in scale — six pockets totalling under four hectares — so this isn't a place for a long wooded walk, more a scatter of smaller spaces stitched between gardens, which suits a village built around private outdoor space rather than shared parkland. The area's overall character grade sits solidly in the "above the national average" band, and health and safety both grade at the top of that scale, which matches a place where crime numbers are genuinely small in absolute terms — well under fifty incidents across the past year. But it's worth sitting with the one grade that doesn't fit the pattern: safety grades A while the crime rate itself, driven mainly by violent and sexual offences and vehicle crime, actually runs well above Buckinghamshire's county rate. The trend is flat rather than worsening, and the raw counts are low enough that a handful of incidents move the percentage sharply — but it's the one number in this file that doesn't nod along with everything else, and worth a second look rather than a dismissal.
Put together, this is a village for people who've already arrived somewhere in life rather than people arriving at something — established households, older children or none at home yet, a preference for a quiet plot over a walkable strip of cafés, and a willingness to pay a serious premium for that quiet. It won't suit anyone wanting nightlife on the doorstep or a bustling parade of shops to browse; what it offers instead is space, a low hum of activity, and a crime profile that, read carefully rather than at a glance, asks a fair question about what "safe" means when the numbers and the grade don't quite agree.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.