Village · 1,454 residents
Good · better than 7 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Ramsden Heath scores 68/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (80).
It scores lowest on health (26).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Ramsden Heath in East of England, each measured against the national average.
Detached houses on generous plots, hedgerows rather than pavements in places, and a scattering of period farmhouses — Ramsden Heath reads as the kind of Essex village where the school run happens by car and nobody's in a hurry. With a population of only 255, this is small enough that you'd recognise the postman.
The numbers back up that first impression of comfort. This is a village sitting in the ninth income decile and eighth for general deprivation, which puts it among the better-off pockets of the East of England, and the housing market confirms it: detached freeholds dominate what little turns over here, with a median sale price of £540,000 against Chelmsford's borough-wide £395,000 — a third higher than the district it belongs to, and firmly in the upper reaches nationally. Downham Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary is the one school the data captures, an academy serving the immediate area; beyond that, families here are likely looking further afield for secondary options, and the median age of 47.5 — seven years above the national figure — tells you this is not primarily a village of school-run parents. It skews toward people further along, settled rather than starting out.
Green space is generous relative to the tiny population — over six hectares across eight sites for 255 residents is a spacious ratio by any measure — though there's little in the way of restaurants or named venues here to build a weekend around; this is a village where Saturday means walking the dog or driving somewhere else for dinner, not strolling to a high street. Connectivity fares well for a place this size, with full fibre reaching close to four in five homes, and the transport grade sits comfortably above average even without a rail station recorded in the immediate data. The overall grade is the headline here — an A, with safety graded the same — and the one crime count of note, violence and sexual offences at 28 incidents making up close to 40% of a very small annual total, is worth reading in context: eight recorded crimes across twelve months in a village of 255 people is a low base, and percentages swing hard on small numbers.
This suits people who've made their money and want quiet: retirees, older professionals, anyone trading commute convenience for space and a garden. It won't suit someone wanting a walkable social life or a wide school choice on the doorstep. The trade-off is honest rather than hidden — you're paying a premium over the surrounding district for scarcity and calm, not for amenities that aren't there.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.