Village · 298 residents
Fair · better than 1 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Pains-Hill scores 54/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (77).
It scores lowest on food & drink (17) and health (34).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Pains-Hill in South East, each measured against the national average.
Pains-Hill reads as detached houses behind hedges and gravel drives, the kind of place where a For Sale board is more likely to say "freehold, four bedrooms, no chain" than anything requiring a leasehold solicitor. Of the handful of recent sales here, the large majority were detached freeholds, and that pattern alone tells you the sort of buyer this village is built around — people trading up, not starting out, with a median age comfortably ahead of the national figure.
Money-wise, this sits near the very top of the scale nationally — both income and deprivation deciles at the ceiling — and the property figures back it up: a median sale price north of £860,000, with detached homes here fetching well over double the national detached average. Against Tandridge, the wider district, Pains-Hill actually runs cheaper by some margin, so relative to its own neighbours this is not even the most expensive corner. There's no rail station or nearest-Outstanding school logged for the immediate area, and only a single transport stop noted, so this reads as a place built around the car rather than the platform. For schooling, Limpsfield CofE Infant School (rated Good) and Hazelwood, an independent school, sit in the mix — a signal that some families here opt out of the state system entirely rather than commute for it.
Crime is low in absolute terms — eleven incidents logged in the past year across a population of around 300 — and the safety grade sits at the top of the scale, flat rather than improving or worsening, which in a village this size usually just means little changes year to year. The one grade that doesn't quite match the rest of the report card is nightlife, sitting mid-table alongside connectivity and transport — a reminder that what you're buying into is quiet rather than social. Full-fibre broadband reaches only about half of properties, which is worth checking street by street if you work from home. Green space and eating out aren't detailed in what's logged here, but the shape of everything else — detached homes, high freehold share, no new-build churn, an older resident base — points to a settled, low-turnover village rather than one with a café strip or a evening scene.
This suits someone who has already done the commuting years and wants space, quiet, and a garden more than a station platform or a restaurant list. It's less convincing if you need rail links on your doorstep or want the energy of a high street; the absence of those things from the picture here isn't an oversight, it's the point.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.