Suburb · 9,757 residents
Good · better than 7 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Orford scores 66/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (72) and infrastructure (70).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Orford in North West, each measured against the national average.
Terraced streets dominate here, row after row of them, and the "For Sale" boards you'll spot are mostly leasehold — this is a place built for turnover, not for grand statements. Nearly four in five sales in the area are terraces or flats, and the tone on the street is workaday rather than aspirational: unpretentious, dense, lived-in.
The numbers behind that streetscape tell a consistent story. A median house price of £150,000 sits well under both the regional figure and the national average, and even against Warrington as a whole you're looking at property priced around 39% lower — this is one of the more affordable corners of the borough, not just the country. Income and deprivation deciles land in the lower half nationally, which lines up with what you see: modest terraces, a fair number of flats, few new builds. Rents average £890, again under the national median, so the affordability case is real, but it comes paired with a lower income decile locally — this isn't a place where cheap housing means spare cash, it's a place where wages are lower too.
Schools are a mixed bag rather than a clear draw. The average Ofsted rating across the four schools sits almost exactly on the national norm, nothing to particularly chase or avoid. Median age of 39.3 suggests a fairly settled, slightly older population than the national median — not a young-family magnet, not a retirement pocket either, more the kind of place people stay once they've arrived. With 35 transport stops serving the area, getting around locally looks reasonably well covered, though this reads as a bus-and-street network rather than a rail commuter's shortcut.
The one figure that jars against an otherwise steady picture is crime. Overall grades sit in solid B-plus territory — affordability, connectivity, environment, health and housing all read as comfortably at or above the national average, and safety itself is graded B+ with an "improving" trend. But the crime rate here runs 170% higher than the Warrington average, driven heavily by violence and sexual offences, which account for over half of all recorded incidents. That's the quiet contradiction of Orford: a place that grades well on liveability fundamentals, in a borough where the wider crime rate is comparatively low, so the local spike stands out more than it might elsewhere. It's worth sitting with rather than skating past, even as the trend line moves in the right direction.
Green space is reasonably generous for a dense suburb — 15 pockets covering 18 hectares — enough for a proper walk without leaving the area, and broadband is a genuine strength, with full-fibre coverage above 91%, useful if working from home is part of your week. Council tax on a Band D property runs close to the national median, so there's no nasty surprise waiting there.
Put together, this is a place that suits people prioritising affordability and day-to-day practicality over polish — a settled, moderately connected suburb where your money goes further on housing than almost anywhere comparable, but where the safety picture, particularly around violent crime, deserves a proper look rather than a glance at the headline grade.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.