Suburb · 748 residents
Good · better than 4 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Neighbourhood boundary drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors
Norham Manor scores 58/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for food & drink (80) and environment (76).
It scores lowest on infrastructure (30).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Norham Manor in South East, each measured against the national average.
Norham Manor reads like a bit of Oxford that never quite stopped being a university postcode: tall Victorian villas carved into flats, bicycles chained three-deep outside them, and a population whose median age sits nearer 23 than 40. This is student and young-academic country, dense in a way the numbers back up — population density here comfortably outstrips the regional average — and the streetscape has that particular North Oxford mix of grand brick frontages and shared doorbells with six names on them.
Housing here tells its own story before you even see a For Sale board: flats dominate the sales mix, freehold slightly edges out leasehold, and a typical flat changes hands for nearly double the national flat price. A median house price around a million pounds sits above even Oxford's own average, though technically just under the wider district figure, so you're paying an Oxford premium on top of an Oxford premium — this is a decile-10 corner on both income and deprivation measures, among the least deprived pockets anywhere in the country, and the price tag reflects that rather than any recent surge; the market here has been flat for a while, not booming. Rents follow the same logic, running well above the national median. For schools, the names in the area skew independent and higher-education — New College School, Dragon School, and the University of Oxford itself all sit here, which tells you this is a place shaped around academic life rather than the standard state-primary catchment run.
Green space is scarce but concentrated: one significant plot of nearly 29 hectares does the work that elsewhere might be spread across several parks, and with Oxford's centre close at hand, eating out and daily life lean on the city rather than a self-contained high street. What stands out in the pattern of grades is the gap between how the area feels and how it costs: environment and nightlife both grade among the best nationally, health and schools sit solidly good, yet affordability and connectivity drag down near the bottom of the scale — broadband and full-fibre coverage here lag what you'd expect for the price being asked. Safety holds steady rather than improving or worsening, and violence and sexual offences make up the largest single share of recorded crime, a pattern common to dense, nightlife-heavy university areas rather than a sign of a place in decline.
Who fits here is fairly clear from the shape of it all: people who want to be inside Oxford's academic and social orbit, renting or buying a flat rather than a family house, prioritising walkable culture and long-term rootedness in the city over broadband speed or elbow room. Anyone weighing a garden, a car, or a fast fibre connection against the budget will feel the trade-offs quickly; anyone drawn to dense, young, intellectually charged streets will feel instantly at home.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.