Suburb · 440 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Newton Moor scores 52/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for infrastructure (70).
It scores lowest on food & drink (23) and health (23).
Safety isn't scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Newton Moor in North West, each measured against the national average.
Newton Moor is terraced streets and semis packed close together, the kind of place where front doors open almost straight onto the pavement and the density tells you this was built for working families rather than commuters wanting space. At under 40 median age, with semis and terraces making up most of what's for sale, it reads as settled rather than transient — people who've been here a while, not a revolving door of renters.
The housing picture is straightforward: freehold and leasehold sit almost evenly split, terraces dominate the sales, and at a median price around £222,500 this is noticeably cheaper than Tameside overall, even though it actually sells above the borough's typical £200,000 mark by over a tenth. Nationally it's among the more affordable corners of the country — comfortably below the typical English home — which keeps the "For Sale" boards attractive to first-time buyers rather than investors chasing new-build gloss (there's no new-build stock here at all). On schools, Yew Tree Primary carries a Good rating, and with nine schools reachable on foot, families aren't short of options close by, though Rayner Stephens High School's progress scores suggest secondary outcomes are a mixed picture rather than a selling point. Rail is thin — one station reachable within a short walk — so this reads as a bus-and-car suburb more than a rail commuter's base, even with over a hundred stops within easy reach.
Green space is where the place does something clever: just one named park sits inside the boundary, yet the reachable green space totals nearly four times the local hectares on paper, and over four-fifths of residents fall within a few minutes' walk of a park — that gap between what's counted and what's reachable is the whole story of why it doesn't feel as hemmed in as the density suggests. Eating out isn't a strong suit here, and the nightlife and health grades sit noticeably below the rest of the scorecard — a D+ against a run of B's and B+'s elsewhere, which is the one grade worth pausing on. This isn't a place built around a buzzing high street or easy GP access; it's built around getting home, seeing the park, and knowing your neighbours.
This suits people who want affordability and space over polish — first-time buyers, established local families, anyone who values a short walk to a park over a short walk to a wine bar. It asks you to accept weaker health-service access and a thin night-time offer in exchange for housing costs well below the national going rate and a genuinely walkable green space reach. Whether that trade sits comfortably with you is really the only question that matters here.
Safety isn’t scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.