Village · 530 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 villages
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Newbold-on-Stour scores 77/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (81).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Newbold-on-Stour in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Newbold-on-Stour announces itself through its front gardens: detached stone and brick houses set well back from the road, cars rather than buses in the driveways, and a quiet that has nothing accidental about it. This is a village in the fullest sense — a scatter of homes rather than a settlement built for passing trade, and it attracts people who have already decided they want space over convenience.
There's no rail station listed for the village itself, so this is a place you drive from, not commute out of on foot — worth knowing if your working week depends on a platform rather than a car park. Schooling nearby centres on Ilmington CofE Primary, a Good-rated voluntary controlled school with just over a hundred pupils, the kind of size where a child is known by name rather than by class list. Housing here leans heavily toward detached freehold homes — six of the ten recent sales were detached, and every single one was freehold — which is the classic signature of a village where people buy once and stay; the median age of 49 backs that up. A For Sale board on this street is usually announcing a family home changing hands after a long stint, not a starter flat.
Money-wise, Newbold-on-Stour sits comfortably: it falls in the eighth decile nationally for both income and deprivation, meaning it's better off than most of the country, and the numbers show it. The median sale price of £495,000 runs well above the national figure and over a third higher than the wider Stratford-on-Avon district it belongs to — this is one of the pricier corners of an already comfortable area. Green space is modest in scale — eight pockets covering just 2.4 hectares — but with a population this small, that stretches further than the raw figures suggest, and it's the kind of village where a walk tends to lead out past the houses into open country rather than round a municipal park.
The safety picture is where the story gets interesting. The overall grade sits at the top of the scale, and most sub-grades — schools, transport, environment — follow suit, painting a picture of a place that performs well above the national average across the board. Crime is genuinely low in absolute terms, but violence and sexual offences account for close to a third of the handful of incidents recorded, an unusual concentration for a village this size, even if the trend is holding flat rather than worsening. It's a single data point wagging against an otherwise A-grade dog, and worth reading as texture rather than alarm — the actual count is small enough that one incident moves the percentage sharply.
Who ends up here tends to be settled rather than searching: households past the first-home stage, comfortable with driving for their commute and their shopping, drawn by a freehold house with a garden and a school where the headteacher knows the children by name. It rewards patience and a car, and it will not suit anyone who wants a station platform at the end of the road or a high street to wander. For the right temperament, though, it delivers exactly what its grades promise — quiet, settled, and about as safe as villages get.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.