Neighbourhood · 6,447 residents
Fair · among the lowest-scoring suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
New Parks scores 46/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (76) and infrastructure (70).
It scores lowest on food & drink (13) and health (37).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for New Parks in East Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Rows of semi-detached houses dominate New Parks, pebble-dashed and privet-hedged, the kind of streets where a For Sale board means a freehold three-bed changing hands rather than a flat chain restarting. It's a young-ish place — the median age sits well below the national figure — and the density of the streets, packed in tighter than most English suburbs, tells you this is terraced-and-semi territory, not one built around gardens and space.
The housing picture is straightforward: nearly all sales are freehold, semis and terraces make up the bulk of the market, and prices undercut both the national median and, modestly, the city of Leicester itself. That affordability shows up in the grades too — schools and connectivity both come back above the national average, and with 52 transport stops serving a compact suburb, getting around without a car isn't a stretch. On education, Brook Mead Academy carries an Outstanding rating for secondary-age children, though the primary picture is more mixed — Heatherbrook is rated Good, Buswells Lodge is marked as Requires Improvement, and several others simply haven't been inspected recently enough to say either way.
Green space is real here — fourteen separate patches adding up to over 25 hectares, enough that a walk doesn't have to mean the same loop twice. What doesn't come through in the data is a strong food or nightlife scene; the nightlife grade is the one flat note in an otherwise solid set of marks, suggesting evenings out mean travelling into Leicester proper rather than staying local. Health provision, by contrast, is rated among the strongest in the area profile, which matters more day-to-day than a lively high street does.
The harder truth sits in the safety figures. Violence and sexual offences account for four in ten recorded crimes, and the overall crime rate runs well above what you'd see across Leicester as a whole — more than double, by the city comparison. That's the outlier against an otherwise respectable B-grade profile, and it's the number worth sitting with rather than skimming past. Combined with an income and deprivation ranking in the lower end nationally, this reads as a suburb doing better than its economic starting point would suggest — connectivity, schooling and green space all outperforming what decile 2 income levels might predict — but safety hasn't caught up yet, and the trend line there is flat rather than improving. Anyone weighing this place up is really weighing that one trade-off against everything else.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.