Neighbourhood · 11,106 residents
Fair · better than 2 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Myatt's Fields scores 53/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as fair — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (70).
It scores lowest on affordability (22).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Myatt's Fields in London, each measured against the national average.
Flats dominate here, block after block of converted terraces and low-rise estates packed close together, and the streets have that particular inner-London density where you're never far from a bus stop or a corner shop. This is a young crowd — the median age sits around 33 — and the population density, well over five times the national average, tells you this is a place built for people who don't need much outdoor space of their own because the street and the park do that job instead.
The practical picture is mixed in a way you should sit with before deciding. Schools skew reasonable rather than exceptional — Van Gogh Primary holds a Good rating, and Saint Gabriel's College offers secondary provision with progress scores around the national average — but the area doesn't carry a standout Outstanding name, so temper expectations there. Transport is served by two dozen stops rather than a marquee station, which fits the C grade for transport: fine for local journeys, less convincing if you're commuting somewhere specific. Housing is almost entirely leasehold flats — 73 of the 83 recent sales — so a For Sale board here is overwhelmingly advertising a flat purchase with a service charge and a lease length to check, not a freehold house with a garden.
Money is where the story gets interesting. The median house price of £510,000 sits almost exactly level with Lambeth as a whole, and it's actually above the national picture by some distance, yet the income and deprivation deciles land in the bottom third nationally — a well-off London property market sitting on top of a less affluent resident base, which is a common enough tension in this part of the capital but worth naming plainly. Renting isn't cheap either, at over £2,500 a month. Green space is generous for the setting, with 32 green spaces across the area giving it a genuinely good ratio for inner London, so the outdoor life exists even if gardens don't.
Safety is the sharpest edge. Crime runs a third higher than the Lambeth average, with violence and anti-social behaviour together accounting for more than half of all reported incidents — that's the one figure that cuts against an otherwise fairly solid grade pattern (health, connectivity and schools all read comfortably, safety itself graded reasonably even as the underlying crime rate runs hot). It's not an area in crisis, but it's not a quiet one either, and that contradiction — decent grades sitting over a genuinely elevated crime count — is the thing to weigh rather than gloss over. This suits someone who wants inner-London density, decent broadband and green space on the doorstep, and who has made peace with leasehold flat living and a level of urban crime that's real rather than rare.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.