Suburb · 2,262 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Mumps scores 77/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (93) and transport (77).
Safety isn't scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Mumps in North West, each measured against the national average.
Terraced rows and low-rise flats dominate around Mumps, the kind of streets where a For Sale board still reads "leasehold, needs work" more often than not — this is a place built for renters and first-time buyers rather than anyone chasing a forever home with a driveway.
The numbers behind that impression are stark: Mumps sits in the bottom decile nationally for both income and general deprivation, and the median house price of around £115,000 is a fraction of the England-wide £281,000 figure, with terraces here changing hands for roughly half what a terrace fetches nationally. That affordability is real, but so is the trade-off — this is a leasehold-heavy market (18 of the 23 recent sales), dominated by terraced stock with almost no new building, which tells you most of what's on offer here has some age and shared-freehold complexity attached. Against Oldham itself, the borough this sits within, property is around 41% cheaper, so even locally this is one of the more affordable corners.
On getting around, Mumps punches well above its size — Oldham Mumps Metrolink stop anchors a dense little transport node, and with 38 stops packed into a small, densely populated suburb (population density here runs at nearly double the national average), you're clearly looking at a car-optional life if you commute into Manchester or around Oldham. Schools follow an unusual pattern: Beever Primary holds a Good rating, and The Blue Coat CofE School — a large secondary academy — is rated Outstanding with solid progress scores, which is a genuinely strong option to have attached to an area this deprived on paper. That contrast, strong transport and a standout secondary school sitting inside one of the most deprived pockets in the country, is the real story of Mumps rather than any single grade.
Day-to-day, this reads as a young, transient population — median age 29, well below the national 40 — renting rather than settling, likely drawn by the connectivity and the price point rather than long-term roots. Crime figures are very low in raw count, though the local rate sits far above the surrounding borough average, with violence and sexual offences the dominant category; it's worth reading that as a small-numbers effect in a dense urban node rather than a defining trait, but it's there in the data and shouldn't be waved away. Green space and dining options don't feature strongly in what's on record here, which fits the picture of a compact, transit-oriented suburb rather than one built around weekend leisure.
Mumps suits someone who values connectivity and affordability over space or polish — a renter or first-time buyer commuting via Metrolink, unbothered by leasehold terraces and light on expectations for green space or a buzzing high street. Anyone prioritising outdoor space, new-build housing, or an established, settled neighbourhood feel will find this a harder fit, whatever the school and transport numbers say in its favour.
Safety isn’t scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.