Neighbourhood · 7,059 residents
Very good · better than 9 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — electoral ward boundary, used as the nearest surveyed shape
Motspur Park scores 73/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as very good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (86) and schools (73).
It scores lowest on affordability (34).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Motspur Park in London, each measured against the national average.
Motspur Park reads as a settled, semi-detached sort of place — the streets around the station are lined with 1930s houses, hedges trimmed, cars on the drive rather than the kerb, and a noticeable quiet once you're off the main road. It attracts people who have already done their searching elsewhere and landed here on purpose: the median age sits around 42, older than both the London and national averages, which tells you this isn't a place full of shared houses and first flats. It feels like a destination for a second or third move, not a first one.
The practical picture holds together well. Motspur Park's own rail station anchors the area even though the wider stop count is thin, and that single line into town is really the point of living here if you commute. Coombe Boys' School turns up in the local mix as a sizeable academy with respectable progress scores, and the broader schools grade for the area is about as strong as these grades get — genuinely one of the area's calling cards. Housing is dominated by freehold semis and terraces, sold mostly as family homes rather than flats, and at a median of £740,000 you're paying a premium of roughly 14% over the Kingston upon Thames borough figure, itself already one of London's pricier patches. Price growth has been essentially flat over the past year, so you're buying into stability rather than momentum.
Green space is modest rather than abundant — four spaces covering a little over twelve hectares — but it's enough to give the area a breathing quality that denser parts of London lack, and the population density, while above the national average, is noticeably lower than the regional norm for outer London boroughs. There isn't a long restaurant strip to speak of; this is a place where you drive or train out for your evening rather than wander down the road for it. Crime is where the one surprising note sits: the overall safety grade is strong, among the best bandings going, yet the borough comparison shows the local crime rate running nearly double the Kingston average, with violence and anti-social behaviour the largest shares. That's a genuine tension worth sitting with rather than smoothing over — the area still feels and scores safe in absolute terms, but it is not quietly below its neighbours, it's above them.
This suits people settled into a routine already — established households, commuters who've traded speed for space, families leaning on the school's reputation rather than nightlife or density. It asks you to accept London-outer-zone prices and a security picture that's good but not as clean as the headline grade first suggests, in exchange for a quieter, more grown-up version of suburban London.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.