Town · 4,678 residents
Excellent · among the highest-scoring towns
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Official built-up area
Moreton-in-Marsh scores 96/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as excellent — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for safety (97) and environment (84).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Moreton-in-Marsh in South West, each measured against the national average.
Moreton-in-Marsh still runs on a wide, honey-stone high street built for market days, and it shows: independent shops rather than chains, a pace that suggests most people here aren't rushing anywhere, and a population small enough that everyone's median age sits close to fifty rather than the national forty. It reads as a place people move to rather than pass through, which brings a certain settledness to the streets — this is not a village of shared houses and late-night takeaways, and the crime figures back that up: burglary and vehicle crime barely register, though violence and anti-social behaviour make up the bulk of what does get reported, in a total that's modest by any urban standard.
The station is the quiet trump card here — Moreton-in-Marsh Rail Station puts London within reach without a car, which is unusual for a place this size and this rural, and it's part of why the area scores so well on transport despite its size. Schooling is thinner: there's one sample school, St David's Church of England Primary, rated Good rather than Outstanding, and with only one school in the immediate picture, families weighing this move should look at secondary options a little further out before committing. Housing leans heavily toward detached and freehold — of the recent sales, detached and terraced properties each outnumber flats many times over, and freehold ownership dominates almost completely, so a For Sale board here usually means a whole house, not a share of one. At a median of £370,000, it undercuts the wider Cotswold district by close to nine per cent, though it still sits above the national median comfortably; the five-year price trend is flat rather than climbing, so this isn't a market moving fast in either direction.
Green space is generous for the population size — nineteen separate spaces across the village, well above the density you'd expect nationally per head — and that, paired with a walkable centre, shapes most weekends: a wander before or after using the shops, dog walks rather than organised leisure. Healthcare and environment both score at the top of the local grading pattern, which tracks with what you'd feel on the ground — this is a well-kept, low-density place, not a place under strain. The one grade that sits slightly out of step with the rest is schooling, solidly average rather than exceptional, in a village that otherwise scores near the top on almost everything else.
Who fits here is fairly easy to picture: someone in their forties or beyond, working remotely or commuting into London occasionally rather than daily, who wants space, quiet, and a short walk to a decent butcher rather than a nightlife scene. Younger families will want to check secondary schooling carefully, and anyone used to city density or diversity of amenity will find this a smaller world. But for the buyer who wants a freehold house, a functioning train line, and a crime rate that stays low year on year, it's a difficult place to find fault with.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.