Suburb · 2,431 residents
Good · better than 3 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Moorhey scores 55/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (84).
It scores lowest on property market (36).
Safety isn't scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Moorhey in North West, each measured against the national average.
Terraced rows run close together here, dense enough that you notice how tightly the streets are packed — this is one of the more compact corners of Oldham, built for mill workers rather than modern parking needs, and it still reads that way. The population is young, with a median age under 28, and the streetscape has that slightly unfinished, working energy of a place where people are getting on with things rather than performing for visitors.
On paper the essentials split in two directions. Health outcomes here are genuinely strong, and connectivity holds up well too — full fibre reaches the vast majority of homes, which matters more than it sounds for a place this dense. But schooling is a weaker link: the sample includes Horton Mill Community Primary and Sapience Girls Academy, neither with a published Ofsted rating in this data, so you'd want to visit rather than assume. Oldham Mumps is the local station, giving you a way into Manchester without a car, though the area type sits firmly in commuter-suburb territory rather than destination-in-itself. Housing is where the story turns: a £150,000 median sits well below the national figure and even below the regional one, and it's cheaper again than the Oldham average itself. That affordability is real, but it comes paired with a C grade for housing quality — the terraces are what's on offer, overwhelmingly leasehold, and the sort of stock that needs a careful survey rather than a confident offer.
Green space is thin on the ground — four small patches totalling under three hectares, nothing like the regional norm for breathing room — so this isn't an area that answers to parks and long walks. What it does have is density: nearly 8,500 people per square kilometre, well above the national average, which shapes daily life around corner shops, bus stops, and a tight web of streets rather than green rambles. The crime picture needs careful reading too — the raw count locally is tiny, just a handful of recorded incidents, but set against Oldham's borough-wide rate the comparative uplift is sharp, and violence and sexual offences account for two out of three incidents logged. That's a statistical quirk of small numbers as much as a verdict on safety, but it's the one grade — a C against an otherwise much stronger pattern — that doesn't match the rest of the picture, and it's worth sitting with rather than skating past.
This suits someone drawn by the economics first: a genuinely low entry price, strong fibre connectivity, solid health infrastructure, and a rail link that keeps the wider region reachable. It asks you to accept a plainer streetscape, limited open space, and schools you'll want to check in person before deciding. If affordability and connection matter more to you than parkland and polish, it's worth a visit; if you're chasing green space or an outstanding school on the doorstep, look elsewhere in the borough first.
Safety isn’t scored here: street-level police data for the area is incomplete, so the overall score leaves it out.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.