Suburb · 153 residents
Good · better than 6 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Middle Madeley scores 61/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for health (74) and environment (72).
It scores lowest on food & drink (23).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Middle Madeley in West Midlands, each measured against the national average.
Middle Madeley is terraces and semis rather than anything showy — a small, settled pocket where the housing stock is almost entirely freehold and the streets read as established rather than aspirational. There's no new-build sheen here: not a single recent development in the sales sample, just a straightforward mix of terraced, semi-detached and detached homes that have clearly been changing hands within families and long-term owners for years. The median age of 46.8 tells you this isn't a place full of first-time buyers or young sharers — it skews older than both the regional and national picture, and it feels like it.
For a For Sale board here, the story is affordability with a caveat: a median price of £230,000 sits well below the national average, but it's still 21% above the wider Newcastle-under-Lyme district figure, so you're paying a premium relative to your immediate neighbours for whatever it is that sets Middle Madeley apart — likely the schools and the green backdrop. On education, the pattern is unusually strong for a small suburb: The Meadows Primary School carries an Outstanding rating, Sir John Offley CofE Primary is rated Good, and Madeley High School shows solid progress scores for an academy converter. That's a trio worth building a family life around, though you'll want to check the older secondary's more recent inspection status yourself since it isn't showing in current records.
The green-space provision here runs close to both the regional and national averages, which combined with the low population density — under 350 people per square kilometre against a national figure many times higher — gives the place a distinctly unhurried, semi-rural feel rather than a suburban crush. It's the kind of setting where dog walks and school runs are the main rhythm of the week rather than restaurant-hopping; there's little here in the way of a dedicated food and drink scene, which shows up honestly in the nightlife grade — the one noticeably lower mark against an otherwise consistent set of B and A grades. Health provision reads as solid rather than exceptional, in keeping with the overall picture.
Crime sits low in absolute terms — thirteen incidents recorded in the past year across a small population — though violence and sexual offences account for over half of that count, a pattern worth registering even at this scale rather than dismissing. Set against decile 5 for deprivation and decile 3 for income, this is a place of modest, unspectacular means rather than either hardship or wealth — solidly average nationally, quietly comfortable locally. It suits people who've already decided that a good primary school and a patch of green matter more than a buzzing high street, and who are content with a slower, older-skewing, family-anchored kind of quiet.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.