Neighbourhood · 150 residents
Good · better than 8 in 10 suburbs
Check Local Score out of 100 · 60 is typical for the country
Each arc is a topic, coloured by its score
Map outline: Approximate — no official boundary exists for this neighbourhood
Marsh scores 68/100 overall, which the scorecard rates as good — 60 is typical for the country.
It stands out for environment (87) and affordability (80).
Scores come from official data on safety, schools, transport, prices, health, food & drink and the local environment, for Marsh in Yorkshire and The Humber, each measured against the national average.
Marsh sits in that particular Yorkshire pattern of stone terraces and older detached houses sitting side by side, the kind of streetscape where a For Sale board is more likely to say "freehold terrace" than anything a developer built recently — there's no new-build here at all, and the sales mix leans heavily towards those Victorian-era terraces with a handful of larger detached homes scattered in. The median age of 52 tells you this isn't a place full of young professionals starting out; it's settled, with people who've been here a while and aren't in a hurry to leave.
Money-wise, Marsh reads as comfortably placed without being flashy: it sits in the upper-middle of the income and deprivation scales nationally, and house prices — a median around £315,000 — run well above what you'd pay in Bradford as a whole, the borough it belongs to. That's the trade-off written into the postcode: you're paying a premium relative to the wider district for a quieter, more established corner of it. Rent, by contrast, undercuts the national figure by a wide margin, which suggests a mismatch that favours buyers with equity already in place over first-time renters testing the water. Council tax on a Band D property sits close to the national average, unremarkable either way.
Crime is where the picture gets more textured. The headline numbers are small in absolute terms, but set against Bradford's borough-wide rate, Marsh's is markedly lower — this is a quieter pocket within a bigger, harder-edged district, and the grades bear that out, sitting in solid B territory rather than anything alarming. Violence and sexual offences and burglary lead the local breakdown, which is common enough in small, tight-knit residential areas where a handful of incidents can dominate the percentages; it's worth reading as texture rather than threat. Connectivity is a genuine strength — full fibre reaches the vast majority of homes, and with nine transport stops serving a compact population, getting around locally doesn't require much thought, even if the green space on offer is thin, just a sliver of it within the immediate area, so anyone wanting proper parkland will be looking beyond Marsh's own boundary.
This adds up to a suburb that suits people who've already done the hard yards elsewhere — homeowners, older couples, anyone prioritising a quiet, well-connected, freehold-owning kind of life over nightlife or green acreage on the doorstep. It's not a place that will surprise you, for better or worse, and that predictability is really the whole pitch.
Data last updated: 19 October 2026
Pick another area to line them up side by side — the verdict, both Check Local Scores, and what actually separates them.